Quality
in sentence
4328 examples of Quality in a sentence
Some movies are fun to watch despite their overall poor quality.. but not this one.
I was going to give it a 2 for the computer graphics, which were the only redeeming
quality
of this "movie".
I should have turned it off, but I kept watching thinking that there has to be something more...there has to be a redeeming
quality.
Nevertheless, this pretentious as well as cynical commentary on fame and its fleeting
quality
for some unfortunate folks ranks at the bottom of the barrel.
The special effects are the worst ever, there are constant mess-ups and errors, the sound is atrocious, and the video
quality
is horrible, even for a movie that's over a decade and a half old.
Here, he's starring in this poor soap-opera
quality
vehicle as a sheriff whose town gets infected by a plague of poor CGI killer dots.
The acting is of a very high
quality
and so are some of the action scenes.
Budget restrictions needn't be restrictions on the
quality
of the drama! of the uplifting experience that comes from learning something new about ourselves through drama.
Why exactly this movie wasn't excepted to Sundance or Slamdance is beyond me, as in this world of low
quality
crud, we need more movies like Kisses and Caroms out there.
The picture and sound
quality
are terrible - one can but wonder how different things might have been if Anchor Bay or Network had got their hands on it.
This film, shot on a shoestring (which might explain the poor
quality
- they should have shot it on film instead) in documentary style by Russell Mulcahy and Nic Knowland (who went on to helm the far less amusing HIGHLANDER and CATS respectively) at the Townhouse Studios in London, captures Cook and Moore in the process of recording the final Derek and Clive album.
I think it is wrong when people attribute a certain
quality
to a community and expect that to be the their only
quality.
This was a
quality
show.
The talent involved - Colin Firth, Jennifer Ehle, Crispin Bonham Carter, Benjamin Whitlow and the wonderful Barbara Leigh-Hunt on the acting side, Jane Austen on the writing side, and the BBC on the production side - almost guarantees a
quality
production, but as this is, in my opinion, the best Austen dramatization yet to appear on film or television.
Despite the poor
quality
all around of the first one some people gave the source the benefit of the doubt and were willing to try it again.
The 'good' greatly outnumbered the 'bad' in the first season of 'Star Trek,' in terms of episode
quality.
Never mind the
quality
of the picture, it's all that we can afford.
It is shows like Comedy Inc that prove to me that Canadian television is really sick and the industry as a whole needs to be fixed somehow, because if this is the kind of crap that the comedy channel and CTV will turn out again and a again they clearly do not care one bit about the
quality
of their programs, they obviously want to just make whatever is cheap that fits the "Canadian made" bill, and in which case I think they should just pull the plug totally and we can just watch BBC or an American channel.
There are obvious appeals to emotion throughout the film; they could have been left out, and it would have raised the
quality
dramatically.
The
quality
is a little grainy and washed out, but the shorts are still a lot of fun, Tuppertime especially is priceless particularly with the vicar who comes on the air with his flies undone, and Benny is as wonderful as ever.
Silliness of the plot is overshadowed by the
quality
of the musical performances of Ackroyd, Gooden, and Morton (they can actually perform!).
This film is worthy of the kind of special treatment and commentary that accompanies the "special edition" releases of
quality
films on DVD.
The sheer
quality
of this flick shines through.
It may not be everyone's cup of tea (the language and content can be a little 'strong' although entirely appropriate and in context) but anyone who's a fan of
quality
entertainment, shouldn't go past it.
Everything has the same dark, muddy and flat-looking quality, with no real clarity of picture and irritating shakycam going into overdrive during 90 percent of the horror/action scenes because far too many directors today aren't talented enough to stage an effective horror or action scene without it.
Tom Hanks has star
quality
acting here and the chemistry that Daryl and Tom have are blown out of the water!
The acting is horrible, the camera
quality
is equally terrible, and I'm still not sure if I even fully understand the plot.
Burt Lancaster shows he is an actor of such
quality
and class plus almost perfect as the quiet man, on a mission for bloody revenge.
Not only is the film itself of poor quality, but its based around uncertainties, and in some cases downright lies.
The second Cinderella was cute, but lacked originality and seemed lacklustre in
quality.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Their
Which
Education
About
There
Would
Improve
Other
Could
Acting
People
Health
Films
Should
Really
Production
Better
While
Countries
