Quality
in sentence
4328 examples of Quality in a sentence
Well, there wasn't any CGI special effects and 99% of this film was shot inside the bar, but other than that, I didn't feel anything else was compromised that would affect the
quality
of the film.
The acting is telenovela
quality
and so is the plot.
William Girdler made his directorial debut in 1972 with the surprisingly decent exploitation flick Three on a Meathook, and since then basically everything he's directed has gone on to become notorious - though mostly that's because his films are so low quality, not because of any content.
The production
quality
is poor, splicing in badly color-tinted black and white stock footage and clips from the 1940 Brigham Young to show the westward trek and cricket plague.
I used to like Will Ferrell..but after this, I have my doubts about his
quality.
But I would imagine, after hitting a high with Big Daddy, either the
quality
of the films started to wear off, or Sandler just got too big for his britches.
Since its debut in 1989, The Simpsons has been a blessing: comedic work of extremely high
quality.
Since childhood I've found the actors playing the bad guys more interesting than the main characters,at least till about 1970 or so.Many that I viewed in the 1950's didn't last long in a movie or TV program because they were an early victim to the star.Some eventually went on to make names for their selves but for the most part I liked them more when playing minor roles.Some of those minor role villains are in this movie and I found them very entertaining.There's Neville Brand playing King Fisher,a good performer but sometimes a little bit to scary even for me when dealing out punishment.Others like Faro (Lee Van Cleef),Sundown Whipple(John Doucette) and Blackburn(Claude Akins) are in top menacing form.While not a household name another
quality
performer is Robert Middleton playing Ben Ryerson.Whether playing a politician or a mob boss he gives a
quality
performance.In this movie he's a bit grubby looking but handy with both a gun and a knife.Then there's Willie (Elisha Cook Jr) one of Fisher's men.He usually bursts into a room big eyed bearing news but has to grab a quick drink before speaking.So much to my delight the cast includes a rouge's gallery of personal favorites,almost like a dream come true.For those who like the good guys the movie leans more towards a nightmare.Jack Palance plays Jacob Wade the main character.As usual he has the look of a strong tough looking man.His performance is better than usual but that just means it's not as stiff as usual.The story lacks a bit of direction also.Those two points are forgotten because of Anthony Perkins who plays Jacob Wade's son Riley.His part lacks direction or maybe a director as it seems like he or someone else wants to sabotage this movie.First off he's too old and big to be playing the part of the son.When he does show some sign of a emotion it's fitting more for someone at least 10 years younger than him.To the simple statement that his mother(deceased) was a fine woman he responds blandly"talk about my mother again and I'll kill you",really off the wall.Elaine Aiken gives a good performance and is nice looking.In another comment it was basically said her character with it's good qualities has no reason to be interested romantically in the wimpy Perkins character,that's hitting the nail on the head.So this movie was just about what I expected,the minor roles out shining the main characters.One of the main characters looked like a good friend must of gave them the part.
It was shot in digital with a very porno film
quality
and sets, with terrible editing and poor directing, weak actors but beautiful female leads.
While this was great fun for the locals, the practice of utilizing so many amateurs did nothing to enhance the
quality
of the film.
Having revisited POLTERGEIST just recently, I was startled watching this sequel in just how far it deteriorates in overall
quality
from one film to the next.
Sad to say that Terminator Salvation failed to resurrect the franchise with the same
quality
that Batman Begins resuscitated the Batman or Star Trek resurrected that franchise.
Just like Poseidon and Pink Panther, it's clear Hollywood just wanted to cash in on nostalgia instead of creating quality, original concepts.
I found this movie to be of mediocre
quality.
Actually it's kind of good, but the production
quality
isn't what it could be, and so I'm a snob I guess.
But the movie provides a window onto contemporary life in China, with its focus upon villagers in the city, the consuming
quality
of subsistence--daily struggle, family and local cruelties--and the appeal of movies as escape, fantasy, and, ultimately, as source of community.
I think there's an abundance of talent in the country and certainly there's definitely film makers of real talent who have produced moments of real
quality.
First off, they used a 16mm camera that had to have been at least thirty years old, thus making the
quality
of the picture suck.
Fourth, whatever money they had was blown on the menus for the DVD, and their behind-the-scenes footage was better
quality
than the film itself.
:) P.S Sorry for the bad
quality
of my writing, but i'm french!!!
That would also explain why this utter lack of anything of
quality
has such good distribution.
But the production
quality
is surprisingly good.
Plus it was screened at last year's Frightfest, which is usually a guide to a film's
quality.
There is no redeeming
quality
at all to the bad guys and you have to feel that they deserve whatever is coming to them.
Made on a shoestring budget and within a tight time-frame, these factors only seem to add to the rough and ready
quality
of this film.
I was impressed with Disney in what it put out in content as well as quality!!! Great Job Disney!
Everything abut it is bad, from the pathetic acting tot he horrid directing, tot eh VHS
quality
of the film itself to the nonsensical attempt at a plot.
I realize we're not looking for Oscar
quality
in an early martial arts film (especially an American one from the 1980s), but bad is bad and this movie is BAD.
Also, it should be noted that comparing the
quality
of this animation with that of a big budget Pixar movie is extremely ignorant.
The film is legitimate "anti-cinema", sort of a big screen TV pilot that doesn't even come close to the
quality
of contemporary TV.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Their
Which
Education
About
There
Would
Improve
Other
Could
Acting
People
Health
Films
Should
Really
Production
Better
While
Countries
