Quality
in sentence
4328 examples of Quality in a sentence
No one is saying that the subject matter isn't good, just the
quality
of the movie itself.
Hoover's heavy hand (did he have any other kind?) shows throughout with teevee
quality
script-reading actors, cheesy sets, cheap sound effects and lighting 101.
However, with home video
quality
and a slapdash production, "Visitor Q" just doesn't hold up even as a curiosity.
Science Fiction fans seem to watch anything anymore regardless of
quality.
Michael Madsen must have done this movie as a favor to someone.The picture
quality
is grainy all the way through .And what little plot there is,is just plain stupid .I give this movie a 1 out of 10 if I could give it a lower score I would .Don't waste your time on this movie or you'll regret it.
The production
quality
was fine, but the plot was undeniably lame and I can honestly say that I am only a couple hours older and a lot dumber now.
Though the
quality
of the acting was good overall, the content of the film was appalling.
December holiday specials, like the original Frosty, ought to be richly-produced with
quality
music and a wholesome, yet lighthearted storyline.
I was really surprised that this one wasn't made by the people at Brain Damage as that was the
quality
of Dead Creatures.
This is why I own a copy of Charlie's Angels (2000) - not a
quality
film, but it makes me laugh and allows me to unwind for a while.
Not only is the writing atrocious and the jokes awful, but the camera work and film
quality
are amateur at best.
In gore films it is
quality
not quantity, the effects are weak!
One would hope that being directed by her talented husband, who's created some interesting and/or terribly entertaining work, would bring out the same
quality
Madonna showed in "Desperately Seeking Susan"; alas, it just isn't meant to be, for here she is, at her very worst: singularly convinced of her own greatness, the smugness permeating every frame she's in, made all the more unbearable by her wavering faux-British accent, an accent that only underscores the fact that her speaking voice is immature in
quality
and not especially pleasant.
BLOOD CASTLE is one of those trashy European horror films that has almost no redeeming
quality
except for being thoroughly entertaining, for all the bad reasons.
As for the quality...in one scene filmed on a public transportation bus you could see the reflection of the crew...guess what?
The shots are generic, conventional, and of television movie
quality.
The snow drenched scenery is gorgeous, yet the characters held with in it have a similar
quality
to that of looking at a photograph of such scenery, the overwhelming feeling being that of distance.
Some of the editing is fairly high
quality
and the work of an veteran professional, the dialogue however is clunky and artificial, having little bearing on 'real' conversations at all seemingly.
I've seen better production
quality
on YouTube!
It's a shame really, as the premise for the movie was good and with better production quality, direction and script it could have been a decent movie.
The actor helping to critique Messing's potential outfits in an early scene brings a delightful absurd-yet-winning
quality
to the proceedings.
Many have spoken about it's redeeming
quality
is how this film portrays such a realistic representation of the effects of drugs and an individual and their subsequent spiral into a self perpetuation state of unfortunate events.
Everything about this movie screams low quality, I can't believe how such a thing gets released!
I can only attest to the DVD version so maybe the VHS version is better
quality
wise but the movies night and dark scenes have been so poorly done that everythings seems red.
You'd think a channel like that would show more
quality
films.
That relatively speaking, Mash had some production quality, (by television standards) of that era and today, and therefore it is deserved of a two.
This film should serve as a lesson to all past, present and future film makers...when you have a film as successful as the original "Corpse Grinders" was you should probably leave sleeping dogs lie and you should definitely not try to revitalize it over twenty years later (unless you have the financial backing to pull of a superior sequel such as Herschel Gordon Lewis did with "Blood Feast 2: All U can Eat") Even if you do decide to do this you should probably spend a little bit more money than you did on the original and for god's sake...NEVER film a movie onto video...why do film makers even attempt to do this when everyone knows the
quality
is going to turn out hideous...I personally have yet to see one film made in this fashion that's even worth the powder to blow it to hell...if you can't afford to make a sequel that is better than your original film then sell the rights of the film to someone who can...and what was Ted V Mikels thinking about (or smoking) when he wrote this god-awful script?
The only redeeming
quality
of this movie is that it was bad enough to be comedic.
Nobody could like this movie for its merit but, if you have a sense of humor and enjoy schlock movies for their MST3 quality, then this is for you.
Total project seems to have the
quality
of a quickie and at times Nelson is way over the top.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Their
Which
Education
About
There
Would
Improve
Other
Could
Acting
People
Health
Films
Should
Really
Production
Better
While
Countries
