Example collocations logo

Providers in sentence

409 examples of Providers in a sentence

And of course mobile providers benefit as well from operating in an expanded rural market.
If most community members work for just a few employers and obtain health care from just a few providers, the effort of corralling the players will be easier.
Not surprisingly, despite its theoretical benefits, health IT has few fans among health-care providers.
But health-care providers can shorten the process of transformation by learning from other industries.
HITECH has undeniably accelerated IT adoption among health-care providers.
Health-care providers and hospital systems can dramatically boost the impact of health IT by reengineering traditional practices to take full advantage of its capabilities.
Health-care providers and first responders must receive proper training.
That means working with local hospitals, clinics, ministries, and health-care providers, which can serve as key conduits for bioengineering expertise.
Subsidized services should be delivered by qualified providers, regardless of their public or private, for-profit or non-profit status.
The reasoning is practical, not ideological: private providers are often available in places lacking public facilities.
When the Ministry of Health guarantees to provide a medical intervention, private providers must do the same.
Though political resistance and financial limitations have slowed expansion, this is arguably the most far-reaching universal coverage scheme, because it creates competition among all kinds of insurers and health care providers.
However, research shows that where health care is of low quality, training providers on basic protocols for diagnosing and treating common illnesses is very cost-effective, saving children’s lives for as little as $14.
This approach enables government to raise private capital that would otherwise not be available to support such services, and to cut their costs by working with proven providers to achieve measurable outcomes.
For patients and providers alike, this is very good news.
Futures traders knew about the growth of China and other emerging markets; but they expected supply – mainly from low-cost Middle East providers – to increase in tandem with demand.
Systematic reviews have summarized the evidence regarding the provision of hospital services by large for-profit companies versus not-for-profit providers.
The primary studies forming the basis of these reviews come largely from the United States, where for-profit and not-for-profit providers work side by side in the same environment, and where large administrative databases allow accurate detection of death rates.
The reason that not-for-profit providers can achieve higher quality care with better health outcomes at lower cost is evident.
While for-profit providers have higher administrative costs and larger executive salaries, their main burden relative to not-for-profit provision is the need to generate returns for their shareholders.
These additional costs mean that approximately 20% of the total income that not-for-profit providers can devote to patient care is unavailable.
The available evidence provides strong support for public funding of health services delivered by not-for-profit providers.
At the same time, Chinese officials understand that further progress toward a services-led economic rebalancing will stall without the talent, systems, experience, and scale of global multinational services providers.
Service providers should understand that their users will expect the transparency, respect, and recognition that are fundamental to any relationship.
Restricting access to legal abortion leads many poor women to seek abortion from unsafe providers.
Moreover, the Israeli National Transplant and Organ Donation Center now openly encourages providers, insurance companies, and the Donor Card Institution, to pay families who consent to donate the organs of their deceased relative.
While many factors contributed to this surge, most experts agree that the single most important cause was a fee-for-service system that rewarded health-care providers for billing as many services as possible, rather than for keeping people healthy and treating their illnesses efficiently.
Around the US, providers, insurers, non-profits, and local governments are responding to the ACA’s incentives.
For example, responding to the ACA’s incentives and flexibility, Arkansas and Oregon have launched bold experiments to revamp Medicaid, in part by rewarding health-care providers who deliver better outcomes and keep patients healthier.
Those who promote equitable and inclusive development wish to see Chinese aid as part of an integrated international community of providers that is governed by responsible co-ownership.
BackNext