Example collocations logo

Property in sentence

1809 examples of Property in a sentence

For that, economic actors must combine received technologies with content specific to their location, which cannot be acquired or transferred through standard channels, such as textbooks, and thus cannot be perfectly diffused as either public information or private property.
They did not have to respect private property in land because until 1785 they owned all the land.
The reason is simple: the lack of credible property rights under Putin’s system of crony capitalism forces senior Russian officials and oligarchs to hold their money abroad, largely within the jurisdictions of the Western governments against which Putin rails.
But in the absence of credible property rights, wealthy Russians, including Putin’s own cronies, know that the only safe places to keep their assets are abroad.
When its equity and property bubbles burst in the early 1990s, the keiretsu system – “main banks” and their tightly connected nonbank corporates – imploded under the deadweight of excess leverage.
Most troubling are differences related to intellectual property.
Property rights and zoning.
Ambiguous property rights, especially to agricultural land, prevent industrialization in rural areas.
America’s Weak Case Against ChinaNEW HAVEN – On the surface, United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer appears to have made an ironclad case against China in the so-called Section 301 report issued on March 22.Laid out in a detailed 182-page document (which, with 1,139 footnotes and five appendices, would make any legal team blush with pride), the USTR’s indictment of China on charges of unfair trading practices regarding technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation seems both urgent and compelling.
As a result, Chinese-sponsored intellectual property theft is now taken as a given by an America that increasingly sees itself as a victim.
Establishing and upholding equal property and inheritance rights can increase women's access to credit and other productive resources, and creating greater awareness of legal rights in general will help reduce discrimination.
After all, full separation implies that resources from elsewhere in a given banking group are unavailable to address a retail-banking crisis resulting from, say, a slump in residential and commercial property prices.
Chinese property values and manufacturing assets would also be vulnerable, as the US abandons its role as importer of last resort and China’s coastal-export development strategy turns out to be a dead end.
The liberal bureaucracy, in its attempt to privatise state property as soon as possible and thus create a class of proprietors to ensure the stability of market reforms, lost control over capital movements in the financial sphere, allowing several big financial industrial groups to become what was later termed the "oligarchy".
By privatising state property "we wanted things to be better, but it still ended up ‘like always'."
By effectively enforcing property rights and implementing national policy, the Chinese Communist Party became the institutional mechanism that bridged the divide between the elites (the Party) and the masses.
Easing restrictions on development would curb property speculation and allow cities to grow, create more jobs, and increase the supply of affordable housing.
The right to own property, vote, work, divorce, the right to choose whether or not to have children have been secured only through political struggle.
Obviously, the legacy of colonialism – widespread hunger, illiteracy, lack of property or legal recourse, and vulnerability to state violence – is a major factor in their current poverty.
The 1848 uprisings around Europe were substantially a protest against voting laws that limited voting to only a minority of men: property holders or aristocrats.
There will still be some regions where failed states do not protect property, enforce the law, encourage commerce, educate their citizens, or construct the physical, social, and organizational infrastructure necessary for people to make use of the magical technologies we have developed since the start of the Industrial Revolution.
This time, the countries’ presidents will meet at a time of intensive American attention to the US-China trade balance and other economic issues, such as protection of intellectual property rights.
A more difficult issue for Hu could be intellectual property rights.
Intellectual property protection is related to economic development, so the question should be whether China has reached the stage at which effective protection is possible.
A limited state will emerge only if the part of society that values freedom, property and security becomes politically active.
There are also economic issues that need to be addressed, such as China’s failure to respect intellectual property, its large government subsidies to export-oriented firms, its restriction of access to its market, and its efforts to require foreign firms doing business in China to transfer advanced technology to Chinese firms.
The G-20, on the other hand, includes autocratic governments with different views about the role of the state in the economy, and on the rule of law, property rights, transparency, and freedom of speech.
After all, property collateral is the bedrock of the Chinese financial system, with estimates of banks’ direct and indirect exposure to real estate ranging from 66% to 89% of GDP.
Complicating matters further is the government’s lack of options for stabilizing property markets.
Hence, throughout the Republican regime, and especially at times of military dominance, it faced official pressure and confiscation of property, as did all other non-Muslim and Muslim religious institutions.
BackNext