Property
in sentence
1809 examples of Property in a sentence
But government is not just a potential enemy of private
property.
In an anarchy, individuals may own property, as a dog owns a bone.
Individual
property
rights and contracts scarcely existed under communism.
Totalitarian control was so complete that he had the same interest in productivity of the Soviet Union as a
property
owner does.
Even aside from the insecurity of new
property
rights, the gains of privatization are often uncertain at best.
Combine this with a burgeoning institutional infrastructure for private
property
rights, and an improved standard of living cannot be long in coming.
Part of the rule of law is security of
property
rights – if you owe money on your house, for example, the bank can’t simply take it away without following the prescribed legal process.
So America needs a “homeowners’ Chapter 11.”Lenders complain that such a law would violate their
property
rights.
Our new legislation, recently passed, allows for more private investment in the energy sector, while guaranteeing that Mexico maintains the
property
rights over its vast natural resources.
Indeed, branding and intellectual
property
issues will become increasingly “complicated” for hardware, just as they are now for software and content.
But China also tilted the trade field to its advantage by subsidizing state-owned enterprises, engaging in commercial espionage, and requiring foreign firms to transfer their intellectual
property
to domestic “partners.”
This trend has been accelerated by Russia’s lack of any real
property
rights, which has enabled the Kremlin to cut Russia’s wealthy down to size at will, often targeting the most law-abiding among them.
Research reveals that strong enforcement of
property
rights and stable, predictable, and non-confiscatory tax and regulatory regimes are essential to long-run economic prosperity.
Debates rage over the bilateral trade balance and revaluation of the renminbi, the status of Taiwan and Tibet, human rights violations, and intellectual
property
theft.
Moreover, China’s government continues to subsidize state-owned enterprises, and either steals intellectual
property
or requires its transfer to Chinese partners as a condition of foreign companies’ access to the domestic market.
Trump could win personal kudos with a compromise that involved some concessions, both real and apparent, that Xi is willing to make – on the size of the trade imbalance, on intellectual
property
laws, on further market opening for US multinationals and financial institutions, and so on.
He is already working to eliminate graft, restrict the scope of administrative approvals, reduce the state-owned sector’s advantages, clarify
property
rights in land, and simplify welfare, tax, and financial regulations.
Without an independent judiciary, secure
property
rights, and a check on corruption, Putin’s modernization will mimic Brezhnev’s.
Having become exceptionally bloated during the pre-2008 boom years, Ireland’s banks buckled under huge losses when the
property
bubble burst.
In any resource-rich and undemocratic country, the political class and the business interests that surround it have little or no incentive to support stronger
property
rights, the rule of law, and competition.
Ferguson snazzily summarizes the reasons for this reversal in six “killer apps”: competition, science,
property
rights, medicine, the consumer society, and the work ethic.
China is brutally ordered – outside any multilateral framework – to import more, export less, cut subsidies, refrain from purchasing US tech companies, and respect intellectual
property
rights.
But here, too, mounting risks have been largely ignored, owing partly to the collateralization of real property, which is believed to retain its value permanently, and partly to the system of implicit government guarantees that backs loans to local governments and SOEs.
In a worst-case scenario, falling
property
prices or diminishing faith in implicit government guarantees would compound the risks generated by the shadow-banking system, severely undermining China’s financial stability.
With issues concerning international trade, investment, competition, and intellectual
property
rights increasingly linked, global approaches that can address them in a holistic way have become vital.
After Greece was allowed to enter the eurozone, interest-rate convergence, combined with inflated
property
prices, fueled an increase in household debt and caused the construction sector to overheat, placing the economy on an unsustainable path.
It is the government that enacts and enforces the copyright, patent, and trademark laws that protect intellectual
property
rights, guaranteeing successful innovators a steady stream of monopoly profits.
This will depend on an objective assessment of the costs of the war in terms of loss of life, destruction of property, economic impact within Iraq, spillovers into other forms of violence such as terrorism, and geopolitical consequences.
In the countries that currently do well on the Ibrahim Index of African Governance – Botswana, Ghana, South Africa, and others – citizens can use the law to protect themselves and their
property
from illicit encroachment, and to resolve their disputes in an impartial setting.
The SADC’s censure of Mugabe and his regime should be backed up by concrete actions, such as restrictions on all arms flows to Zimbabwe, travel restrictions on senior officials of Zimbabwe’s ruling ZANU-PF party, and the threat of
property
seizures and the freezing of financial assets in the region and beyond.
Back
Next
Related words
Rights
Intellectual
Their
Which
Private
Would
Market
Other
About
Prices
There
Economic
Countries
Protection
Could
People
Government
Investment
Trade
While