Example collocations logo

Privacy in sentence

638 examples of Privacy in a sentence

Privacy is not a privilege – a comfort that desperate people should have to give up.
Though some IGOs are exempt from these requirements, such organizations must strive to implement best practices with regard to privacy, ethics, and data protection.
The first step is to carry out a privacy impact assessment (PIA).
A PIA is a tool used to identify, analyze, and mitigate privacy risks arising from technological systems or processes.
While there is no single established approach to undertaking a PIA, experience has produced some best practices, comprising a set of privacy principles and criteria, according to which systems for collecting, storing, and share refugees’ data should be assessed.
For a PIA to work, it must weigh privacy against other imperatives, such as efficient aid provision.
But a high-quality PIA can help an organization assess and mitigate the privacy risks associated with the use of information and communications technology, biometric technologies, geo-location tracking devices, and so on.
It is not a solution to the privacy challenge faced by refugees and their advocates, but it is an important step in the right direction.
Most people have a high level of tolerance for whatever invasions of privacy may be involved in dragnet electronic eavesdropping operations designed to identify potential terrorist conspiracies.
Indonesia’s anger, like Germany’s before it, at the gross breaches of their leaders’ privacy has not been feigned, and will not be short-lived.
But the company’s rapid ascent has been accompanied by a steady stream of revelations of dubious behavior, from violating customers’ privacy and deceiving local government regulators to mistreating drivers.
When guests at its Chicago launch party in 2011 were entertained by the company’s “God View” system, which allowed them to see the whereabouts of all current drivers and riders, it was a clear privacy violation, but the demonstration at least kept its subjects anonymous.
In fact, until recently, neither Uber’s board nor its other investors treated Kalanick’s attitudes toward privacy, workers’ rights, and women as serious issues, much less fireable offenses.
A third hazard is privacy violations, because so much of the data now available contains personal information.
But they won’t be unless we zealously protect people’s privacy, detect and correct unfairness, use algorithmic recommendations prudently, and maintain a rigorous understanding of algorithms’ inner workings and the data that informs their decisions.
Privacy is only one part of a larger discussion around data ownership and data monopoly, security, and competition.
Preserving the privacy of victims is a legitimate goal; but broad media bans in Turkey have become a serious concern.
Most important, HRW did so from a human-rights perspective, and its statement is worth quoting:“Subjecting people to criminal sanctions for the personal use of drugs, or for possession of drugs for personal use, infringes on their autonomy and right to privacy.
The right to privacy is broadly recognized under international law, including in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights.
Limitations on autonomy and privacy cannot be justified unless they meet the criteria for any restriction of a basic right, namely legitimate purpose, proportionality, necessity, and non-discrimination.
But equally worrying are policies in the European Union that, in the name of defending citizens’ privacy, are leading to the erection of barriers to the free flow of data.
The solution to privacy concerns lies not in data localization, but in the development of secure systems and the proper use of encryption.
In too many places, facilities are unable to provide even the most basic care – like monitoring a laboring woman’s blood pressure – and women face lack of privacy, unhygienic conditions, or even abuse by staff.
The purported reason for closing The Daily News is that the paper refused to register under the bizarrely named Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA) of 2002 on the grounds that it violates Zimbabwe's constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression.
Likewise, big data offers untold benefits to companies and consumers, but poses a real threat to privacy and personal freedom.
But, though he technically claimed responsibility for Facebook’s failure to protect against “fake news, foreign interference in elections, and hate speech” or to preserve data privacy, he portrayed Facebook as an “idealistic” company focused on “connecting people.”
Some argue that Facebook users can blame only themselves for privacy breaches.
This raises another issue: call it transparency or call it privacy.
One major challenge for a living lab is to protect individual privacy without diminishing the potential for better government.
We hope that the ability to share data safely, while protecting privacy, will encourage individuals, companies, and governments to communicate their ideas widely, and so increase productivity and creativity across the entire city.
BackNext