Privacy in sentence

638 examples of Privacy in a sentence

And so with many privacy provisions put in place to protect everyone who was recorded in the data, we made elements of the data available to my trusted research team at MIT so we could start teasing apart patterns in this massive data set, trying to understand the influence of social environments on language acquisition.

Or should we respect his privacy, protect his dignity and leave him alone?

But yes, it's also true that the Internet has problems, very serious problems, problems with security and problems with privacy.

And really so I've come to the conclusion that the way you protect your privacy, particularly in an era where everything is cataloged and everything is archived and everything is recorded, there's no need to delete information anymore.

What rights of publicity or privacy do they have?

In the States, we take our right to privacy and publicity very seriously.

Privacy is implied.

Privacy is not up for discussion.

This is not a question between privacy against security.

But we need much more privacy and much more freedom and much more autonomy at work.

And that, in turn, results in a fundamental respect, which, I believe, is missing in a large part of technology, when we start to deal with issues like privacy, by understanding that these numbers are not just numbers, but instead they're attached, tethered to, pieces of the real world.

And increasingly, the price we're being asked to pay for all of this connectedness is our privacy.

This is no longer me being a tech pioneer or a privacy advocate; this is me being a parent.

Privacy is not an option, and it shouldn't be the price we accept for just getting on the Internet.

It's an outrageous imposition on my 4th Amendment right to privacy, and you're going to be sued for all the money you've got."

We all worry about our privacy settings on Facebook, but the fact of the matter is, our openness can be used against us.

But as it turns out, for purposes of protecting your privacy at the expense of general GPS reliability, there's something even more potent and more subversive than a Wave Bubble, and that is a GPS spoofer.

So I'm fascinated by this conflict, a looming conflict, between privacy on the one hand and the need for a clean radio spectrum on the other.

We simply cannot tolerate GPS jammers and spoofers, and yet, given the lack of effective legal means for protecting our privacy from the GPS dot, can you really blame people for wanting to turn them on, for wanting to use them?

Or will you be able to resist the temptation to turn on a GPS spoofer or a Wave Bubble to protect your own privacy?

So, when you go home, tell your friends that privacy is a value of the 21st century, and it's not outdated.

To some, this has terrifying privacy and civil liberties implications.

To others it foretells of an era of greater privacy and civil liberties protections, but privacy and civil liberties are of fundamental importance.

They need their bodies, privacy and two minutes, and it can significantly change the outcomes of their life.

Now, I realize that this concept may sound a little Big Brother to some of you, and yes, there are some enormous transparency and privacy issues to solve, but ultimately, if we can collect our personal reputation, we can actually control it more, and extract the immense value that will flow from it.

Now privacy issues aside, the other really interesting issue I'm looking at is how do we empower digital ghosts, people [who] for whatever reason, are not active online, but are some of the most trustworthy people in the world?

And when you have it, you don't have a lot of privacy in the hospital.

People you don't know come in and look at you and poke you and prod you, and when I tell cancer survivors that this tool we created to protect them is actually preventing their data from being used, especially when only three to four percent of people who have cancer ever even sign up for a clinical study, their reaction is not, "Thank you, God, for protecting my privacy."

And although a lot of people like privacy as their methodology of control around data, and obsess around privacy, at least some of us really like to share as a form of control, and what's remarkable about digital commonses is you don't need a big percentage if your sample size is big enough to generate something massive and beautiful.

In addition to that, it can also screen areas for privacy, so that it can differentiate from some of the public areas in the space during different times of day.

Related words