Example collocations logo

Politicians in sentence

3448 examples of Politicians in a sentence

It was just like that, because what you started to see is that all of these grand statesmen, these very pompous politicians, they were just like us.
But if we're really to make democracy vigorous again, if we're ready to revivify it, we need to get involved in a new project of the citizens and the politicians.
After I speak to you today, I'm going on a radio program called "Any Questions," and the thing you will have noticed about politicians on these kinds of radio programs is that they never, ever say that they don't know the answer to a question.
Politicians also need to learn, occasionally, to say that certain things that voters want, certain things that voters have been promised, may be things that we cannot deliver or perhaps that we feel we should not deliver.
But for any of these things to work, the honesty in language, the local democracy, it's not just a question of what politicians do.
For politicians to be honest, the public needs to allow them to be honest, and the media, which mediates between the politicians and the public, needs to allow those politicians to be honest.
In other words, if democracy is to be rebuilt, is to become again vigorous and vibrant, it is necessary not just for the public to learn to trust their politicians, but for the politicians to learn to trust the public.
When you see a vulture like this, the first thing that comes to your mind is, these are disgusting, ugly, greedy creatures that are just after your flesh, associated with politicians.
I wish we both get rid of our idiot politicians, anyway nice to see you!") ("I love that blue.
The politicians I've met are generally very extroverted, friendly, very socially skillful people, and that's the nature of politics.
And all I can really do is hope, not to policymakers or politicians, because as much as I'd like to have faith that they read my words and do something, I don't delude myself.
Politicians in a big, complex, sophisticated I.T. project?
There is a precedent for technology-enabled service that has been initiated by politicians in multiple countries and has been hugely successful: national lotteries.
Things have come to this point because politicians in general, but especially in our countries, let's face it, think people are stupid.
Politics has come to resemble a cynical team game played by politicians, while the public has been pushed aside as if sitting on the seats of a stadium in which passion for politics is gradually making room for blindness and desperation.
Seen from those stairs, all politicians today seem the same, and politics has come to resemble a sport that inspires more aggressiveness and pessimism than social cohesion and the desire for civic protaganism.
It's not just about politicians and laws.
You can tell politicians that these cuts [can cost] lives.
And so when the pundits and the politicians say that change is impossible, what this love of country says back is, "That's just irrelevant."
Our Reichstag project, which has a very familiar agenda, I'm sure, as a public place where we sought to, in a way, through a process of advocacy, reinterpret the relationship between society and politicians, public space.
Let me end it with words from politicians who were similarly distant.
So our politicians are limited to local politics, while our citizens, even though they see a great potential, are prey to forces beyond their control.
And everyone agrees: Politicians and scientists are in agreement that we are headed for a phosphorus crisis.
This engine, well, it's driven by our international banking system, by the problem of anonymous shell companies, and by the secrecy that we have afforded big oil, gas and mining operations, and, most of all, by the failure of our politicians to back up their rhetoric and do something really meaningful and systemic to tackle this stuff.
How can we convince politicians to write global public policies following this idea?
That's to say, the people who were mistrusted 20 years ago, principally journalists and politicians, are still mistrusted.
Do you trust politicians?
The aim, I think, is more trustworthiness, and that is going to be different if we are trying to be trustworthy and communicate our trustworthiness to other people, and if we are trying to judge whether other people or office-holders or politicians are trustworthy.
So if you dig below the headlines, though, you'll see that the people were far ahead of the press, far ahead of the politicians.
In fact, I think most politicians would be happy to have those kind of poll numbers.
BackNext