Often in sentence

12358 examples of Often in a sentence

And I know I as a writer will often try to include a lot of empty space on the page so that the reader can complete my thoughts and sentences and so that her imagination has room to breathe.

So it turns out there are a lot of people going around stealing passwords, and they often go and post these passwords on the Internet.

And I think the answer is yes, and that's because problems that affect future generations are often hugely neglected.

And by that we mean that scientists don't necessarily start with theories and hypotheses, often they just start with observations of stuff going on in the world.

Besides inductive science, scientists also often participate in modeling.

And one of the things he had observed is that if you look at mountains like the Appalachians, you often find that the rocks in them are folded, and they're folded in a particular way, which suggested to him that they were actually being compressed from the side.

Now this quotation has often been taken out of context, because Feyerabend was not actually saying that in science anything goes.

Of course, pitch often goes along with pace to indicate arousal, but you can do it just with pitch.

I can now say, and often do, to any government, in order to do well, you need to do good.

I want to try to convince you that prejudice and bias are natural, they're often rational, and they're often even moral, and I think that once we understand this, we're in a better position to make sense of them when they go wrong, when they have horrible consequences, and we're in a better position to know what to do when this happens.

And in fact, in general, people are often swayed by feelings of solidarity, loyalty, pride, patriotism, towards their country or towards their ethnic group.

Now, this distinction is natural enough and often moral enough, but it can go awry, and this was part of the research of the great social psychologist Henri Tajfel.

So often they're rational and useful, but sometimes they're irrational, they give the wrong answers, and other times they lead to plainly immoral consequences.

One avenue is to appeal to people's emotional responses, to appeal to people's empathy, and we often do that through stories.

And so this raises the question, and so, as Smith puts it, "When our passive feelings are almost always so sordid and so selfish, how comes it that our active principles should often be so generous and so noble?"

And this last part is what is often described as the principle of impartiality.

Now I often have joked that I spend almost as much time designing the introduction of change as I do the change itself, and I'm sure that we can all relate to that when something that we use a lot changes and then we have to adjust.

I'm talking about an entire world of information hiding in a small, often invisible thing.

Often, faint and overlapping fingerprints cannot help the police to make an identification.

That was fortunate for me, because in most press photos I appear too, although often between Sophia's legs.

And he often said, the demo only has to work once, because the primary mode of us impacting the world was through large companies being inspired by us and creating products like the Kindle or Lego Mindstorms.

In the West, it's often assumed that Muslims generally condone terrorism.

In fact, many people of Muslim heritage around the world are staunch opponents both of fundamentalism and of terrorism, and often for very good reason.

Some do not, though they're often interrelated.

They're most often about changing people's relationship with Islam rather than preserving it.

Now, faced with these movements in recent years, Western discourse has most often offered two flawed responses.

We're often choosing by guessing, what would other people think about our choice?

Or even when ecological crisis already happens, like a catastrophe in Fukushima, often we have people living in the same environment with the same amount of information, and half of them will be anxious about radiation and half of them will ignore it.

If we go back to this ideology of individual, rational choice we often embrace, it's necessary precisely here to lift this obviousness and to think a little bit differently.

Now for me, a question often is why we still embrace this idea of a self-made man on which capitalism relied from its beginning?

Related words