Example collocations logo

Mostly in sentence

3026 examples of Mostly in a sentence

Mostly, he gets to walk purposefully or angrily out of various rooms.
He did not have a helper to dig up the graves and anyone who owns land in the area knows that it is mostly sand with a little dirt in it.
Mostly the movie is made for the British audience.
While the dialect humor is mostly lame, there is a brief musical sequence involving "black skeletons" that was entertaining.
Clark Gable as Ned Darrell comes off better but mostly because his is a gruff character not given to the philosophical musings of the others which better fits Gable's range.
The '80s was a barren time for Bond flicks mostly, though For Your Eyes Only is a great title.
This one has maybe a few chuckles, but it's mostly just really bad one-liners and dumb physical stuff.
Movies like this can usually be forgiven for any number of reasons, mostly unintended consequences of the feature on every level of production that result in at least a mild form of entertainment, mostly amusement.
So much so that you don't feel bad for Caines character when his son gets murdered (which was actually mostly due to bad editing).
This unintentionally amusing mid-80s TV movie is based on the premise that sex bomb Donna Mills (in a mostly appalling wardrobe throughout) is a neglected housewife, pining for her sexy past as a cheerleader.
The most intriguing thing about this movie is how it has managed to get mostly glowing and positive reviews.
He was never a great actor, was able to get by mostly on his looks and didn't get credible roles until later in his career (Pretty Maids is the exception).
Basically the story is weak and mostly unfunny, but Carrey saves a few scenes with his physical humor, but honestly, Jim Carrey wasn't very funny in this movie, and Tea Leone might as well have been there just for her appearance because she wasn't funny either.
One example is the role of Macro, played by Guido Mannari who has tremendous screen presence in an important role, but is mostly left in the background.
It's a real "shortie" at 59 minutes, and it has the feel of being adapted from a play, since it mostly takes place in a radio station soundstage.
They are mostly the campy works of the 50's that showed up on television on the late show.
The box art made the movie look a hell of a lot weirder than it was, with the promise that "you can lose your life-- or your mind!", but mostly it's two couples trekking through the sticks and "acting" natural.
This was mostly due to the annoying and "artsy" way that the director chose to shoot the film.
When we(EX YU) make films, lots of symbolism is build in it, which makes the characters recognisable and likable, and mostly portraying the truth(if it is based on true story) The films like "Pritty village, pretty flame", "Tito and Me', "Underground',"No mans land', "Before the Rain","Black cat, white cat","Otac na sluzbenom putu",(When father was away on business),"Ko to tamo peva"(Who sings over there?)Rare the masterpiece of the Balkan cinematography,and nothing can compare to it.
I just finished watching Disappearances at AFI FEST 2006 with about 30 other people in a mostly vacant 1000 seat auditorium.
The movie does contain many entertaining scenes, mostly those of the unintentionally funny variety.
I say that loosely, because the story is mostly about the surviving son and the mother, because if the father WAS supposed to have the story focus on him too, they edited the movie pretty poorly.
I speak badly of G.I.J.:T.M. mostly because I think it lacked something that G.I. Joe had.
The film is composed mostly of fairly uninteresting video footage of the countries he visits with bad reenactments, all slow-mo'ed down to a snails pace and overlaid with depressing music.
I found the first bit of stop motion animation intriguing and the mostly live action short with the girl going about in whatever country it was kept my interest, but the other 11 odd shorts really didn't pique my interest or make me think of anything at all.
The photography was mostly in focus.
Wonder why it is shot mostly in the dark, and mostly with Vincent Gallo walking away from the camera, or looking down?
It is mostly, if not completely, inaccurate so much so that the main character does not even resemble how history has him look physically.
Bad acting compromised mostly of local talent and laughable special effects makes this one baaaaad.
Supporting cast (including Tom Selleck and Tom Everett Scott, who mostly acts with his shirt off) is very good, but they can't save the final act, which is disappointing.
BackNext