Example collocations logo

Moral in sentence

2544 examples of Moral in a sentence

The characters defy moral judgment because they are creatures beset by a great woe, a woe that does not permit questions of a moral nature.
To unleash criticism at the film feels really unkind, since it is a movie that deals with earnest themes like humanity, and pleas for upright moral standards and tolerance.
Well I'm blowed, a Woody Allen film that I walked out of after half an hour (I'm aware of the moral fragility of commenting on a film of which I've seen less than half, but I hope you'll understand why).
What made, however, this viewer at least extremely angry with the director was his granting of at least one lengthy scene each to Alexandre and Veronika in which we are clearly expected to empathize with and feel for them as if they shared a moral universe with us.
We can't accept any goodness in him and as a result the rest of the has no moral center.
The interplay between the characters is a moral disaster.
The film's only redeemable quality is that it did make me realize that the character in the "Time Machine" probably should have shown a little more moral outrage at the odd behavior by those in his future.
It is sad that people today still think that they can win moral sway by making a film so easily recognized for it's obvious intent, so far from attempting art.
There is little development (drastically insufficient development) to justify her actions for the affair she has, and when it occurs, one feels, as I did, that she is just of low moral character.
Maybe the moral of the story is "you get what you deserve".
if you are o.k. with cheesy moral plots and don't mind watching a movie that vastly misconstrues Whitman.
It's appallingly scripted and acted, (Michael Caine, Peter Ustinov and William Holden reach a career low in this one), and completely lacks excitement never mind any moral focus.
The moral dilemma faced by the main character is an intriguing one, but due to poor writing and casting this potentially winning premise is plundered.
The basic idea is good: to explore the moral issues that would face a group of young survivors of the apocalypse.
There's nothing inherently wrong with using films eased moral constraints to portray an erotic side to the Tarzan legend.
There is really nothing nice I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime.
Guy de Maupassant was a novelist who wrote a novel about a man, a poor man, without any moral qualities.
It seems like there are explicit moral lessons of the day that are being conveyed, like Sesame Street or something.
The moral equivalencing is sickening, Boorman looks for a hit film, but doesn't have the guts to stand against the criminality of the generals gang, who terrorized the neighbourhood, and unleashed another wave of scumbags upon Dublin.
From the opening sequence of Bo and Luke Duke making a moonshine run for Uncle Jesse (no shine running in the show because it would put the boys back in jail as a parole violation) to the closing sequence of Uncle Jesse smoking weed with the Governor of Georgia (Uncle Jesse was the moral compass despite his previous moonshining ways) this disappointing waste of film is an open faced insult.
The Original Dukes of Hazzard was a family show with basic moral values.
I gave this more than a 1 because I did think there were some moral lessons in this story and it provoked some thought and comment from my wife and I.
The movie tried to portray some kind of moral, but fell flat with its message.
When you pick a movie I hope one factor you will consider, are the actors in the movie using their fame to influence the moral fabric of our society in a positive or negative way?
This is not a political statement this is a moral issue that effects are society.
But, because of that, it is much more disappointing to see after the absurd ending, with the impossible death of the boy, the charming tone, the happiness of the executive's family, the cheap moral, the unbearable laughter of the daughters, the guy waving from heaven as Michael Landon... Really nasty, in my humble opinion.
I thought this movie had absolutely no moral.
Chris, an adopted son of a moral family, a loser whom works at the school newspaper with Kate (Christine Lakin from of the awful sugary "Step by Step" show of the now thankfully defunct ABC's TGIF line-up), finds out that he's just inherited a porn empire from his biological parents.
A slightly below average teen comedy that steals from better teen comedies (the opening alone is HIGHLY American Pie-esquire), bops you on the head with the moral every chance it gets, and wastes the only star talent it has (Wayne Newton, Lin Shaye, and if i'm really stretching the star word, Martin Starr of "Freaks and Geeks", and Justin Berfield of "Malcolm in the Middle").
But it's supposedly about possessive love, destructiveness and moral decadence, while actually being about designer gowns, shots of the Riveria, lots of big expensive cars, and music-and dancing interludes that suggest Vincente Minnelli on one of his off-days.
BackNext