Example collocations logo

Migration in sentence

1241 examples of Migration in a sentence

Populist parties of the left and right – with their shared hostility to free trade, migration, Muslims, and globalization – are becoming more popular throughout Europe.
But what we are seeing is its member states increasingly adopting a national approach, thus undermining the possibility of Europe-wide solutions (the migration crisis is a tragic case in point).
But, amid the triple threats of climate change, violent conflict, and mass migration, how that information is gathered and shared is changing.
Human migration would surge, and struggles over resources would intensify.
Despite talk of strengthening regional cooperation, a framework for dealing with migration remains an elusive prospect.
Australia’s new migration policy harms people in countries like Pakistan.
Policymakers recognize the need to address migration, but, so far, the challenges have outweighed the solutions.
But human-rights organizations – as well as the president of the Australian Human Rights Commission and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – report that shunting migrants to non-Australian territory will not deter migration.
Meanwhile, America is benefiting from Asian migration.
The international community must recognize that migration not only stimulates economies, but also provides an opportunity to build business and trade linkages between economies.
But, without an effective global migration policy, we can be certain that more people will die trying to secure their future.
Add to that external and internal pressures – including from surging Islamism, civil wars, and mass migration from conflict zones – and the future of several Arab countries appears uncertain.
True, some of the old EU countries have opted for a prohibition of labor migration during a transition period that is initially set at two years and may be extended to April 2011.
Such people already enjoy full freedom of free migration today.
While the directive’s rules governing migration of employed and self-employed people hardly differ from previous EU law, the migration and social-welfare rights of non-working EU citizens have been significantly extended.
Western Europe has already experienced three decades of indirect migration into the welfare state, as social benefits have created artificially high wages for the unskilled, simultaneously fueling excessive immigration and unemployment.
The directive on free movement implies a new era of direct migration into West European welfare states.
But efforts to reform the system have been met with strong resistance, especially from local governments and residents, who fear the strain that unregulated migration to their cities will have on resources, employment, and services.
But make no mistake: There is nothing normal or healthy about economic performance that is increasing inequality and, in many countries, leading to a populist backlash – both on the right and the left – against trade, globalization, migration, technological innovation, and market-oriented policies.
Desperate Women’s Dangerous MovesGENEVA – One of the most significant recent trends in migration has been the rise in the number of women using dangerous routes previously used mainly by men.
This is desperation migration.
Of course, most migrant women do not encounter mistreatment or die on their journeys; in fact, many derive real benefits from migration.
But, among the world’s estimated 111 million migrant women (half the total), violence and abuse can occur at any time, starting from the very outset of the migration process.
Throughout the migration cycle, women are more at risk from physical violence by fellow migrants, smugglers, and state officers, and can be forced to exchange sex for transportation, food, or accommodation.
But migration from Eastern Europe in those years was blocked by the Iron Curtain.
In principle, with flexible labor markets, migration creates welfare gains for all countries.
Emigration countries gain because their nationals can earn an income in Western Europe that, for all but the most marginal migrant, is more than sufficient to compensate for the loss of domestic value added and the subjective and objective costs of migration.
Here migration will result in a welfare loss.
But migrants produce no additional value added for the countries into which they immigrate, but incur migration costs and their contribution to domestic value added is missing.
The EU wants to solve this problem by limiting migration for a transition period of up to seven years.
BackNext