Manufacturing
in sentence
1925 examples of Manufacturing in a sentence
Such broad protectionist measures will affect every sector of US
manufacturing
in one way or another, and manufacturers certainly will not eat the full costs of higher-priced steel and aluminum inputs.
Indonesia’s government has accused NAMRU-2 scientists of everything from profiting from its “sovereign” viruses to
manufacturing
the H5N1 bird flu as part of an alleged biological warfare scheme.
While only about 49% of
manufacturing
startups and 37% of information startups survive for four or more years, those that do have managed to produce breakthrough innovations.
The third was
manufacturing
investment elsewhere in the world – predominantly in Asia – as the US became the world economy’s importer of last resort.
President-elect Trump campaigned on a promise to bring back US manufacturing, even if doing so requires imposing tariffs and dismantling existing trade arrangements.
Meanwhile, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan, and other GBA cities have a strong capacity for innovative market-oriented research and development as well as
manufacturing.
More capital should flow to countries with younger populations – with their growing
manufacturing
bases and consumer markets – to support investment and employment growth; and more labor should flow to countries with aging populations, to fill gaps in the workforce.
The negative effects have often been concentrated in particular industries and geographic regions (such as the historically industrial Rust Belt of the United States), where
manufacturing
can be costlier and less efficient than in other countries.
India will never be able to create enough jobs in services alone; it must be able to compete in low-end
manufacturing
areas as well.
Not necessarily, if only because the areas where India excels, notably services, have far higher potential margins than
manufacturing.
Economists have identified six pitfalls that can afflict natural-resource exporters: commodity-price volatility, crowding out of manufacturing, “Dutch disease” (a booming export industry causes rapid currency appreciation, which undermines other exporters’ competitiveness), inhibited institutional development, civil war, and excessively rapid resource depletion (with insufficient saving).
Temporary commodity booms typically pull workers, capital, and land away from fledgling
manufacturing
sectors and production of other internationally traded goods.
They also are frequently lured away from
manufacturing
by booms in construction and other non-tradable goods and services.
If the
manufacturing
sector has been “hollowed out” in the meantime, so much the worse.
Moreover, China’s once seemingly inexhaustible surplus of rural labor willing to migrate to urban areas has largely disappeared, causing wages to rise and the country’s competitive advantage in labor-intensive
manufacturing
to weaken.
The economy has shifted from
manufacturing
toward services, where there is less scope for productivity growth.
But, as Nicholas Lardy persuasively argues, they could also reflect the economy’s shift from heavy
manufacturing
toward services – a shift that is highly desirable in helping China’s natural transition to the more sustainable trend.
And, indeed,
manufacturing
is arguably an important source of innovation and economic growth.
China’s
manufacturing
boom is fuelled by imported minerals, such as iron ore and chromium, which southern Africa possesses in abundance.
Imports of cheap Chinese goods threaten to displace regional production, particularly in labor-intensive
manufacturing
sectors that are finding it difficult to compete.
As the reactive pathology of codependency would suggest, none of these countries can be expected to acquiesce to such measures without curtailing US access to their markets – a counter-response that could severely undermine the
manufacturing
revival that seems so central to the Trump presidency’s promise to “Make America Great Again.”
Where US
Manufacturing
Jobs Really WentBERKELEY – In the two decades from 1979 to 1999, the number of
manufacturing
jobs in the United States drifted downward, from 19 million to 17 million.
But it is wrong to suggest that all was well in
manufacturing
before 1999.
There were fewer workers making boots and shoes, but more workers
manufacturing
chemicals, constructing buildings, and operating the turnkey at the Wellman-Lord Construction Company’s Florida-based phosphate-processing plants and other factories.
So, during the supposedly stable post-war period,
manufacturing
(and construction) jobs actually moved en masse from the Northeast and Midwest to the Sun Belt.
Until 2006, the number of
manufacturing
jobs decreased while construction jobs increased.
Because there is always some degree of churn, a more accurate perspective on what has happened is gained by looking at blue-collar jobs as a share of total employment, rather than at the absolute number of
manufacturing
workers at any given time.
In fact, there was an extremely large and powerful long-run decline in the share of
manufacturing
jobs between World War II and now.
This gives the lie to the meme that
manufacturing
was stable for a long time, and then suddenly collapsed when China started making gains.
In 1943, 38% of America’s nonfarm labor force was in manufacturing, owing to high demand for bombs and tanks at the time.
Back
Next
Related words
Services
Sector
Growth
Which
Countries
Economy
Sectors
Workers
Their
Industries
Employment
Trade
Other
Global
While
Economies
Economic
Would
Labor
Productivity