Example collocations logo

Judgment in sentence

802 examples of Judgment in a sentence

In my judgment, such rates would be too low.
Developing new theories and empirical tests is regarded as science, while the exercise of good judgment is clearly a craft.
Today’s focus on ineffective and costly climate policies shows poor judgment.
Its judgment recognized that the claimants raised “a number of serious arguments,” and that the education system in Ostrava perpetuated racial segregation.
In a 2012 judgment, the Botswana Court of Appeals wrote that capital punishment has been imposed “since time immemorial,” and “its abolition would be a departure from the accepted norm.”
At a time of great hope and a desire to woo the candidate, desperation or enthusiasm can lead to poor judgment and badly formulated packages, which, once negotiated, are not subject to shareholder vote.
Given this, it recommends that, beyond safeguarding media freedom, EU intervention be limited to regulating cross-border issues – such as libel “forum shopping” (when litigants choose the court to which to take their case based on the likelihood of a favorable judgment) – and promoting a European public sphere.
So, for example, patients close to death are resuscitated, against the doctor’s better judgment, because they have not specifically stated that they do not want to be resuscitated in such circumstances.
He could not have continued on his destructive path if not for the investors and board members who – hungry for profits and full of excuses – allowed misogyny, disregard for ethics, and poor judgment to become entwined in the company’s managerial fabric.
But that judgment seems premature, at best.
Trump’s stunning miscalculations – the naive belief that he could kill off the investigation, or that the Democrats would welcome his act because they were still angry at Comey for how he had treated Clinton – provided insight into his appalling judgment.
Apparently, the next stage in human perfectibility will require us to give up independent thinking and judgment altogether.
And we have reason to call into question companies’ judgment in using that data.
One reason is that there is no reliable way to render an instant judgment about economic effectiveness, and the legacy that Obama inherited – coming to office in the middle of a major economic and financial catastrophe – clearly matters.
This judgment is not limited to particular cultures.
Greene found that people asked to make a moral judgment about “personal” violations, like pushing the stranger off the footbridge, showed increased activity in areas of the brain associated with the emotions.
Moreover, the minority of subjects who did consider that it would be right to push the stranger off the footbridge took longer to reach this judgment than those who said that doing so would be wrong.
Unfortunately, the moves against Golden Dawn are mostly identified with the government’s interests, rather than being perceived as the result of careful, independent judgment.
In a certain ideological mind-set, Israel is perceived not as a political entity, susceptible to prevailing standards of judgment, but as an almost allegorical force, the symbolic center and source of the globe’s evils and ailments.
But credible criticism must be based on evidence – and on generally applicable criteria of judgment.
The Court relied on the same constitutional doctrines and conceptions of sovereignty elaborated in its Maastricht judgment.
They weaken it by undermining our elected representatives, whose job is to exercise their good judgment rather than voice the gut feelings of an anxious, angry people.
Since America persists in rejecting the present court proposal (which has not yet entered into force), European governments, instead of sticking to it with equal obduracy, would do better to suggest an ad hoc international court to deal with Al Qaida-type culprits, perhaps attached to the Hague Tribunal now sitting in judgment over the war criminals of the Balkan Wars.
In certain cases, the evidence requires a judgment on such a question.
The original Goldstone Report could have limited its conclusory judgment to an assertion that Israel did not meet its obligation under the international laws of armed conflict to take all feasible measures to minimize harm to civilians.
Yet, because Goldstone went further and found a policy of intentionality, before revising that judgment, he should have insisted on additional evidence that his finding was not warranted.
Instead, Goldstone says that his revised judgment is based on the fact that “Israel has dedicated significant resources to investigate over 400 allegations of operational misconduct in Gaza.”
In withdrawing his conclusion that there was a policy of intentional targeting of civilians by Israel, Goldstone has not said that his judgment, based on the evidence before him at the time, was wrong.
Rather, he has said that subsequent investigations by the Israeli authorities have made him change his judgment.
Adapting to these changes with our justice systems’ credibility intact will require broad cultivation of a more refined capacity for critical visual judgment.
BackNext