Infrastructure
in sentence
4036 examples of Infrastructure in a sentence
Meanwhile, pension funds, insurance companies, and other institutional investors are increasingly investing in
infrastructure.
Unlike banks, they have long-dated liabilities, for which the long-term, predictable returns from
infrastructure
investments can be a good match.
In an environment of extremely low interest rates and frothy equity markets,
infrastructure
also looks like an attractive and reasonably safe alternative to stocks and bonds, yielding returns that can ultimately finance the pensions of the West’s aging societies.
So far, however, institutional investors have invested relatively little in infrastructure, partly owing to shortcomings in the overall investment environment.
Moreover, new capital requirements can make it very expensive for insurers to invest in
infrastructure.
Furthermore, many institutional investors do not yet have sufficient expertise to venture into
infrastructure.
And, because
infrastructure
is not yet a clearly defined asset class, investors often find it difficult to plan, assess, and manage their holdings in this area.
These obstacles apply to all
infrastructure
investments.
But urban
infrastructure
is at a particular disadvantage.
More important, urban
infrastructure
projects tend to be small, dispersed, and diverse.
If more private money is to flow into urban infrastructure, the institutional setup must change.
Very large cities can establish their own institutions to match
infrastructure
projects and investors, as Chicago has already done through its
Infrastructure
Trust.
For the rest, governments should create national institutions to support sustainable urban
infrastructure
investments.
They would then be well positioned to act as aggregators – packaging, standardizing, and marketing sustainable urban
infrastructure
projects.
At a later point, they could move on to raise money in the capital market and fund sustainable
infrastructure
alongside other investors.
If the barriers to private investment in urban
infrastructure
could be overcome, the world would benefit from lower CO2 emissions, faster economic growth, and sounder retirement savings.
First, they must accumulate capital, which implies a high savings rate that will help pay for new machines, equipment, and
infrastructure.
In this context, taking the steps needed to upgrade economic systems, including
infrastructure
in the US and the incomplete union in Europe, or to meet historical challenges like the refugee crisis, seems all but impossible.
Such tools include well-designed public-private partnerships, especially when it comes to modernizing infrastructure; disruptive outside advisers – selected not for what they think, but for how they think – in the government decision-making process; mechanisms to strengthen inter-agency coordination so that it enhances, rather than retards, policy responsiveness; and broader cross-border private-sector linkages to enhance multilateral coordination.
Today, however, Afghanistan is the scene not only of the War on Terror, but also of longstanding Afghan-Pakistani disputes, the India-Pakistan conflict, domestic struggles in Pakistan, US-Iranian antagonism, Russian concerns about NATO, Sunni-Shia rivalry, and struggles over regional energy
infrastructure.
The AIIB, for instance, will focus solely on
infrastructure.
In recent years, more than one-third of total bank lending has gone to infrastructure, most of which has been built by government entities.
Indeed, recognizing its over-investment in infrastructure, the government recently abandoned several high-speed rail projects that were already under construction.
Infrastructure
investment will inevitably run up against the law of diminishing marginal returns, but consumption growth does not have a limit.
Cameroon is expected to attract $10 billion over the next few years to develop some of the most promising new mineral reserves in the region, while Equatorial Guinea is pushing
infrastructure
development.
Trump has established
infrastructure
investment, tax reform, and deregulation as central components of his strategy to boost the US economy’s actual and potential growth.
Already, the countries that have been forced to cut the most have generally sacrificed public
infrastructure
investment.
Setting priorities – whether to spend more on education and less on pensions, for example, or whether to invest in
infrastructure
or in research – entails hard choices that should be made explicit.
The Millennium Villages Project, which I have the honor of helping to lead, has demonstrated that pastoralist communities can be empowered through targeted investments in livestock management, veterinary care, business development, mobile health clinics, boarding schools, and local
infrastructure
such as safe water points, off-grid electricity, and mobile telephony.
There are also those who wonder whether there is not an important difference between the provision of an
infrastructure
for services and these services themselves - public tracks and private trains as it were.
Back
Next
Related words
Investment
Projects
Countries
Public
Growth
Which
Education
Development
Would
Their
Economic
Investments
Other
Spending
Energy
Government
Should
Health
Including
Capital