Example collocations logo

Incomes in sentence

1233 examples of Incomes in a sentence

Stagnating or falling real incomes do not just act as a brake on consumption demand and GDP growth; they also fuel social and political discontent, as citizens lose confidence in existing economic structures.
MGI surveys in France, the United Kingdom, and the US have found that people whose incomes are not growing, and who do not anticipate an improvement, tend to view trade and immigration much more negatively than those who are experiencing or foresee gains.
Recent debate about income inequality in the US and other developed countries has focused on the rapid surge in incomes for the few.
But stagnating or falling incomes for the many add a different dimension to the debate – and demand different types of solutions that emphasize wage growth for the majority of the income distribution.
With most households continuing to face stagnating or falling incomes – and with younger generations thus on track to be poorer than their parents – such solutions are urgently needed.
Instead, we should look at Trump’s own analysis of existing agreements in the context of his views on issues such as national security and working-class jobs and incomes.
The opportunity: if the economy was well managed, the incomes of Americans could continue to rise as they had done in the 1990's.
So, as incomes grow, demand for food products grows even faster.
Likewise, US politicians’ ongoing efforts to ban currency manipulation in trade agreements may be an effort to scapegoat Asians for US workers’ stagnant real incomes.
The Report estimates that by doing so, and by improving their investment climates and governance, Central Asian countries can double their incomes over ten years, modernize their economies, connect with the rest of the world, and improve the lives of their citizens dramatically.
Specifically, McKinsey finds that, from 2005 to 2014, real (inflation-adjusted) incomes remained flat or fell in 65-70% of households comprising 540 million people across 25 advanced economies.
In the United States during this period, 81% of the population experienced flat or falling real incomes; in Italy, 97% did.
By comparison, from 1993 to 2005, advanced-economy real incomes remained flat or fell in less than 2% of households.
But even with those measures, up to a quarter of households in some countries experienced stagnant or lower disposable incomes between 2005 and 2014.
To be sure, free trade can reduce prices for consumers and raise real incomes for some workers.
With global trade already significantly freed up – and with incomes already stagnant or falling – claims that new FTAs will boost incomes are dubious, at best.
Despite higher incomes and lower inequality, 70% of Brazilians have expressed a desire for change.
Second, if the total return on wealth is higher than the growth in incomes, wealth is necessarily becoming increasingly concentrated.
Meanwhile, incomes were capitalized at declining interest rates for more than a generation.
By this approach, his finding that wealth grew faster than incomes makes perfect sense – it is a direct consequence of falling interest rates.
Then there are the numerous factors affecting incomes, such as demand for particular skills.
But the incomes from beef, mutton, and wool exports were not ploughed back into the agriculture.
Instead, Sweden created a highly progressive tax system with the world's highest personal income taxes and the smallest dispersion in wage incomes net of taxes.
In July 2016, the McKinsey Global Institute released an extensive report on incomes in 25 advanced economies worldwide.
An astonishing 65-70% of households’ incomes stagnated or declined between 2005 and 2014.
That figure is even more remarkable when compared to the 12 years leading up to 2005, when less than 2% of households’ incomes were flat or declining.
Spending $10 per day on energy services would, for example, exhaust the per capita incomes of countries such as Angola, Ecuador, and Macedonia.
Indeed, household saving rose from 2% of after-tax incomes in 2007 to about 6% in recent months.
One of the key goals was set back in 2010: doubling real GDP and real personal incomes by 2020.
The irony - indeed, the tragedy - is that few policies are so inequitable and morally iniquitous as those that propose huge burdens on today’s generation, particularly its poorer members, in order to prevent what will be at worst an insignificant reduction in the incomes of future generations - who will, in any case, be far richer than we are today.
BackNext