Example collocations logo

Inaccuracies in sentence

81 examples of Inaccuracies in a sentence

For the knowledgeable Beatles fan, the main value in this movie is to just sit back and pick out the flaws, inaccuracies, combined events, omitted events, wildly exaggerated events, omitted people, timeline errors, mis-attribute quotes, incorrect clothing, out of place songs, and (shame shame) incorrect instruments and other boners I just cant think of right now.
One can deal with historical inaccuracies, but this film was just too much.
Historical inaccuracies and inconsistencies aside, this was a great movie to watch with a great cast.
However, to critique historical inaccuracies of his film about Brigham Young and the Mormon people are not necessary or useful in commenting for this film.
Even though Ian Kershaw distanced himself from this project due to inaccuracies in regards to Hitler's life and yes, this is dramatised, but essential.
Overall I give this movies a 7 out of 10 for its good parts (relative accuracy and overall making sense) and for its bad parts (large time skips and small but noticeable inaccuracies).
I have heard the detractors, who say that there are some inaccuracies, or some things left out, but I think that keeping in mind that John Carpenter only had about 2 1/2 hours to work with, and that this was being shown on television (just two years after Elvis's death!) that he did a fine job with this.
The 1996 miniseries was good, but suffered from undeveloped scenarios and some historical inaccuracies.
I don't want to repeat what's already been said in the previous 8 pages of comments about the historical inaccuracies.
It's a typical Hollywood history epic, dramatized, stylized and full of inaccuracies but so what, it's an entertaining movie and a good looking film.
While other users complain of the historical inaccuracies of this movie I do not think this is something people should dwell on too much.
There are many inaccuracies about The Maid.
Laughable historically inaccuracies, poor script, laughable acting and hilarious story make this movie barely worth 2/10.
I understand the historical inaccuracies (they are needed sometimes to make the story flow better) but some of them are grossly and unwisely used.
Aside from the gross factual inaccuracies of this movie (ie king Richard having a son and that son replacing John on the throne) this movie was a sweet love tale full of adventure.
Every detail is meticulously worked out, even more accurately, I believe, than in The Titanic (which, contrary to popular belief, had a few inaccuracies).
By now, most of the Tudors' historical inaccuracies have been well pointed out; indeed, it's safe to say that the only thing that wasn't changed was the names.
Is it the historical inaccuracies?
I just wish that more of our young people had the benefit of the truth of historic record instead of relying on these kinds of factual inaccuracies to guide their thought process.
The historical inaccuracies are so numerous that I found myself shouting "wtf" throughout the entire film.
There were so many inaccuracies.
While I am a history teacher and my friends and family HATE watching historical films with me because I often find fault with the way movies often handle the facts in a fast and loose manner, I still managed to like this film and kept my mouth shut about its many inaccuracies!
I've been looking at the comments on this site, and it looks like almost everyone who posted is very familiar with Boudica and very upset by what are apparently myriad inaccuracies.
Now I rather enjoy finding all the scientific and historical inaccuracies in those old movies about giant insects, shrews the size of dogs, and an underground civilization that lives on mushrooms and speaks English.
It has many historical and technical inaccuracies which might be forgiven if the movie actually had any redeeming qualities other than beautiful cinematography.
In this historical series, there are lots of inaccuracies, as such: While talking to Wosley, the french cardinal says that Pope Alexander is about to die.
That bored, suffering look upon his face throughout the film can only be his French impatience waiting for this stinking film to end! Technical inaccuracies, historical inaccuracies, inept special effects -- there are so many things here to compete with the film's sophomoric script in motivating the viewer to hit the "eject" button long before the actual end.
The historical inaccuracies are mind-boggling.
Terrible casting (or wasteful casting), bad acting, and historical inaccuracies (yes, so called history teacher from the U.S., it DOES matter!) Dumbed down, sexed up entertainment for those who would be just as amused watching a gerbil spinning around in his exercise wheel.
A summary of glaring inaccuracies.
Back