Inaccuracies
in sentence
81 examples of Inaccuracies in a sentence
While not as bad as some movies (like the horrible "Atomic Twister"), "Meltdown" still relies upon common misconceptions and
inaccuracies
about the nuclear power industry to advance its plot.
Writer/director Richard Winer knew exactly that he had to divert the viewer's attention away from the major inaccuracies, so he threw in some elements that never fail when it comes to providing a creepy atmosphere, like the sinister voice of narrator Vincent Price and the oddball music of King Crimson.
It was full of plot holes,
inaccuracies
(doesn't the time-clock stop for injured players or loss of helmets in Texas football games?) and not so much redemption (So Your Dad Beats the Crap out of You?
A very bad film, an amalgam of clichés and historical
inaccuracies.
It's stoic seriousness, mixed with the obvious inaccuracies, is what makes it truly the most boring film I've seen this year; possibly the most action or biopic movie I've EVER seen.
Normally, when one critiques a historical movie, it's always fun to point out the
inaccuracies
that slip in, usually added by the writers to create more "dramatic" situations.
There are other inaccuracies, I'm told, but being the average Joe, I have no idea what they are.
I could pick apart the
inaccuracies
throughout the movie (anyone that has lived on a carrier could), but that would take pages.
I'll dispense with the obvious review of factual
inaccuracies.
This was a movie that could have been great if there were not so many unnecessary historical
inaccuracies
and if the actors had been chosen or made up to look a little more like the real persons (not very difficult).
As with most historical movies nowadays, there are some
inaccuracies
as history is manipulated to better suit the story, which is understandable for the most part.
The inaccuracies, coupled with the sear disregard for one's faith as portrayed by 'Gian Singh' was a disgrace to the highest format.
I did actually read Gregory's book and liked it well enough despite it's HUGE historical
inaccuracies
(I mean the whole fake homosexual angle with George Boleyn in particular), but this movie didn't even mention that.
Well, I have a layman's knowledge of Roman history and even I found the
inaccuracies
flagrant.
First of all the story/script is filled with
inaccuracies
and downright fantasies and in this way creating almost a completely new story while shamefully abusing Andersen's fairy tales, presumably in order to sell the crap to suckers like me.
From reading other comments, there may be some historical
inaccuracies.
I don't what
inaccuracies
were in the movie, all I care is that Buddy Holly overcame the obstacles of music and politics in that time, and the music is nearly-perfect.
It's worth noting that audiences of the time were no more naive about the story than we are today; the NY Times review conceded that audiences would "dismiss factual
inaccuracies
sprinkled throughout the film," described the biographical account of Custer's life as "fanciful," and pointed out that the presentation of Custer's motivations regarding the final events were at odds with various historical accounts.
Although flawed in it's view of homosexuals, this movie will shed light for the viewer about the myths and
inaccuracies
concerning AIDS.
The historical
inaccuracies
of this film have been well documented.
Although the director tried(the filming was made in Tynisia and Morocco),this attempt to transport the New Testament in the screen failed.The script has serious
inaccuracies
and fantasies,while the duration is very long.But the most tragic is the protagonist Chris Sarandon,who doesn't seem to understand the demands of his role.
Historical and technical
inaccuracies
abound.
It moves like molasses, the acting for the most part is either over-the-top ham or under-the-top comatose--although Raul Julia comes off better than most of the rest of the cast--and it's chock full of annoying historical
inaccuracies.
Other vets, and Iraq vets in particular, have summarized the
inaccuracies
in this movie very well.
Since most review's of this film are of screening's seen decade's ago I'd like to add a more recent one, the film open's with stock footage of B-17's bombing Germany, the film cut's to Oskar Werner's Hauptmann (captain) Wust character and his aide running for cover while making their way to Hitler's Fuehrer Bunker, once inside, they are debriefed by bunker staff personnel, the film then cut's to one of many conference scene's with Albin Skoda giving a decent impression of Adolf Hitler rallying his officer's to "Ultimate Victory" while Werner's character is shown as slowly coming to realize the bunker denizen's are caught up in a fantasy world-some non-bunker event's are depicted, most notable being the flooding of the subway system to prevent a Russian advance through them and a minor subplot involving a young member of the Flak unit's and his family's difficulty in surviving-this film suffer's from a number of detail
inaccuracies
that a German film made only 10 year's after WW2 should not have included; the actor portraying Goebbels (Willy Krause) wear's the same uniform as Hitler, including arm eagle- Goebbels wore a brown Nazi Party uniform with swastika armband-the "SS" soldier's wear German army camouflage, the well documented scene of Hitler awarding the iron cross to boy's of the Hitler Youth is shown as having taken place INSIDE the bunker (it was done outside in the courtyard) and lastly, Hitler's suicide weapon is clearly shown as a Belgian browning model 1922-most account's agree it was a Walther PPK-some bit's of acting also seem wholly inaccurate with the drunken dance scene near the end of the film being notable, this bit is shown as a cabaret skit, with a intoxicated wounded soldier (his arm in a splint) maniacally goose-stepping to music while a nurse does a combination striptease/belly dance, all by candlelight... this is actually embarrassing to watch-the most incredible bit is when Werner's Captain Wust gain's an audience alone with Skoda's Hitler, Hitler is shown as slumped on a wall bench, drugged and delirious, when Werner's character begin's to question him, Hitler start's screaming which bring's in a SS guard who mortally wound's Werner's character in the back with a gunshot-this fabricated scene is not based on any true historic account-Werner's character is then hauled off to die in a anteroom while Hitler prepare's his own ending, Hitler's farewell to his staff is shown but the suicide is off-screen, the final second's of the movie show Hitler's funeral pyre smoke slowly forming into a ghostly image of the face of the dead Oskar Werner/Hauptmann Wust-this film is more allegorical than historical and anyone interested in this period would do better to check out more recent film's such as the 1973 remake "Hitler: the last 10 day's" or the German film "Downfall" (Der Untergang) if they wish a more true accounting of this dramatic story, these last two film's are based on first person eyewitness account's, with "Hitler: the last 10 day's" being compiled from Gerhard Boldt's autobiography as a staff officer in the Fuehrer Bunker and "Downfall" being done from Hitler's secretary's recollection's, the screen play for "Der Letzte Akte" is taken from American Nuremberg war crime's trial judge Michael Musmanno's book "Ten day's to die", which is more a compilation of event's (many obviously fanciful) than eyewitness history-it is surprising that Hugh Trevor Roper's account,"The last day's of Hitler" was never made into a film.
The historical
inaccuracies
of the film are not as gross and offensive as in "U-571" (which changes British submariners to American ones) but you still walk away feeling a little slimy.
Inaccuracies
in portaraying punk rock with The Who, piercings and flashy 90's outfits.
Now thats inspirational) Based on all of the
inaccuracies
in the movie, I would suggest passing on this one.
First of all, there are the
inaccuracies.
There are plot-related inaccuracies, physical inaccuracies, and also psychological
inaccuracies.
Next
Related words
Historical
Movie
There
About
History
While
Story
Other
Would
Which
People
Movies
Throughout
Particular
Factual
Better
Being
After
Acting
Viewer