Genetic in sentence

1040 examples of Genetic in a sentence

They're able to calculate probabilities of having a specific trait or getting a genetic disease according to the information from the parents and the family history.

And this is true all around the world; scientists are figuring out new ways to handle their embryos, to get them to settle, maybe even figuring out the methods to preserve them at low temperatures, so that we can preserve their genetic diversity and work with them more often.

I am now part of a small but growing cadre of women of color in STEM who are poised to bring new perspectives and new ideas to life on the most pressing issues of our time: things like educational inequities, police brutality, HIV/AIDS, climate change, genetic editing, artificial intelligence and Mars exploration.

Once scientists figured out how the firefly creates its luciferase and luciferin, they used genetic engineering to make this light-producing reaction occur inside other living things that can't glow.

But we know now that's not how genetic inheritance works.

Instead, random genetic mutations cause some giraffes to be born with longer necks, and that gives them a better chance to survive than the ones who weren't so lucky, which brings us to "survival of the fittest".

Remember, natural selection happens not at the organism level, but at the genetic level, and the same gene that exists in one organism will also exist in its relatives.

All that happens is that random genetic mutations cause the organisms carrying them to behave or develop in different ways.

The taste for spicy food may even be genetic.

But nowadays, the millions of queen bees distributed in commercial hives are bred from just a few original queens, which raises the worry about a lack of genetic diversity which could weaken bees' defenses against pathogens and pests.

These not only convey important physical or genetic information about their source but are able to activate a physiological or behavioral response in the recipient.

And the answer to that question is: depends on your definition of genetic modification.

David Pearce has suggested that genetic engineering and other contemporary processes cannot only alter the way humans experience emotional and physical pain, but that world ecosystems ought to be redesigned so that animals don't suffer in the wild.

So Chris cut right to the chase, and he says, "Well, of all the issues you've been looking at, what are the top five?" "Well, there's genetic discrimination, and reproductive technologies, and biobanking, and ... oh, there's this really cool issue, functional MRI and using it for lie detection, and ... oh, and of course, there's gene patents."

We ended up with 20 highly committed plaintiffs: genetic counselors, geneticists who had received cease and desist letters, advocacy organizations, four major scientific organizations that collectively represented more than 150,000 scientists and medical professionals, and individual women who either couldn't afford Myriad's test, or who wanted to obtain a second opinion but could not, as a result of the patents.

So, if handedness is inborn, does that mean it's genetic?

And evolutionary algorithms, or genetic algorithms that mimic biological evolution, are one promising approach to making machines generate original and valuable artistic outcomes.

But our genetic code still carries the selfish and aggressive instincts that were of survival advantage in the past.

Telomeres cap chromosomes to allow DNA to get copied every time a cell divides without damaging the cell's genetic code, and they shorten with each cell division.

There's been excessive use of chemicals, there's been virus and disease transfered to wild populations, ecosystem destruction and pollution, escaped fish breeding with wild populations, altering the overall genetic pool, and then of course, as just mentioned, the unsustainable feed ingredients.

Genetic factors also play a role in one's ability to grow muscle.

These are considered epigenetic changes, meaning that they effect which genes are expressed without directly changing the genetic code.

15 years ago, I volunteered to participate in a research study that involved a genetic test.

But what if the researchers were interested in investigating some association between ancestry and the risk for certain genetic traits?

That personal experience with the use of race in genetic testing got me thinking: Where else in medicine is race used to make false biological predictions?

President Bill Clinton famously declared, "I believe one of the great truths to emerge from this triumphant expedition inside the human genome is that in genetic terms, human beings, regardless of race, are more than 99.9 percent the same."

And he might have added that that less than one percent of genetic difference doesn't fall into racial boxes.

It's a crude but convenient proxy for more important factors, like muscle mass, enzyme level, genetic traits they just don't have time to look for.

It speculated that race stood in as a proxy for some unknown genetic factor that affects heart disease or response to drugs.

You see, race is not a biological category that naturally produces these health disparities because of genetic difference.

Related words