Example collocations logo

Footage in sentence

985 examples of Footage in a sentence

This movie doesn't have any of that natural footage, which I understand is part of the point, but it really makes the entire video component of the film seem like random images stuck together-- ones and zeroes flying around, computer models of human skeletons, and so forth.
Occasionally the stock footage is put to good effect (the nationalism/finance segment around 35:00), but usually it makes the video appear to lack any meaningful content, and demands you accept the context of the stock photographers rather than the context of the director.
The overwhelming majority of the movie consists of looped footage...the shambling monster, two women exercising, the shambling monster again, a bunch of people in the pool, the shambling monster again, none the worse for wear despite having been injured...you get the picture.
I bought the DVD out of a big bin for $4.99, thinking I'd lucked into some documentary pearl that would actually show extensive footage of the Karakoram mountains, and K2 in particular.
There is an air war movie with lots of footage of WWI vintage planes swooping about and there is the stupid attempts at humor that Blake Edwards seems to think he has to insert in every one of his pictures whether it is appropriate or not, In this case, it was not.
The filming style was the now overused "docu-action" look, complete with cuts to grainy B&W "rawcore" footage.
The lousy dubbing, excess amount of grainy "National Geographic"-like animal stock footage, groovy, jazzy lounge score, terrible acting, talky, uneventful narrative, tepid soft-core sex scenes, and static photography don't help matters any as well.
You might sell some it as stock footage to be used in a part of another film.
Kinda like watching Plan 9 with stock F-16 footage.
Opening with some blatantly reused footage from 'Kit for Cat', 'Tweety's S.O.S' fails to live up to that classic cartoon.
It's a nice-looking print and seems to have all of the footage, but has some cropping/aspect ratio issues.
I don't really know what to say about TYD, first it's a piece of crap, the story makes no sense at all, secondly he uses stunt men in all his fight scenes, and last but not least a lot of the footage is taken from other movies!
We also have a lot of wildlife footage to fill in voids for the 80 mins.
A perfect example of wasted footage is the fast forwarding montage in the first third of the movie.
They obviously got about 40 minutes of footage in the can and then decided to use said footage endlessly and repeatedly to brain-numbing effect.
There was no need for all of this footage - only to create a soft porn film.
The film was poor on many levels: First - Treadwell's video footage was contrived.
The footage is not that great and the text is not that great either.
Anyway, Savage Intruder starts with a bizarre montage of what looks like MGM musical & premiere footage & a few spinning portraits which have no meaning whatsoever in the long run.
There is some good climbing footage at the start; and when the billionaire mission leader asks early in the film "How much experience above 8000 metres do you have?",
Now, it may have some nice footage about the beaches, but that's it; nothing bigger than that... it is all in the camera.
How can the Hollywood types rant about the need for gun control in our society and spend so much time and film footage focused on guns?? It's just worse than expected.
They later told me that, once back in California (we shot in Atlanta), these "professionals" had 4 1/2 hours worth of footage!
They got too carried away with stock footage and photography, so little content.
And instead of burning the footage to hide this amazingly anticlimactic ending to an embarrassing debacle, the guy goes ahead and releases it.
This also marks a big turning point in Seagal's career because this film is the first of his to really dig out the stock footage.
Well, if you've never seen anything to do with Venezuela, there's a lot of travelogue footage of both Caracas and the countryside (and jungle-side), and of the various native peoples at work and play, as well as plenty of indigenous wildlife.
They used footage of some real protest spliced with some woman talking about a society with no men to make it seem like these people were cheering for the 'gendercide' of men.
Once the movie reached the climax we realised that we must have been watching the wrong movie as we had seen the trailer, which had completely different footage, the blurb on the back of the DVD did not match the story we were watching and the credits (actors, producer, director) were also completely different.
More than half of the footage is pure padding and words fail to describe how BORING the film is, even with a running time of a mere 80 minutes.
BackNext