Example collocations logo

Explained in sentence

1250 examples of Explained in a sentence

There is no linear time, the scenes travel around like a fart in the wind, people show up for no reason, then leave, and it is never explained, the plot is never advanced, and nothing happens.
The details of the murders were used, but never explained.
He selected these writers as the popular favorites of the first half of the Victorian period, and he explained their strengths and weaknesses (as he saw them) to the reading public.
Nothing is explained that well, why did Amanda create these monstrous sea creature/human hybrids?
The man's grandson and his friends are set up to be the next sacrifice, for reasons which are never explained.
Minutes later, she is hauled into a clifftop prison for reasons not explained and subjected to the leers and rough handling of staff and other inmates.
Another flaw is that the director deviates from the basic premise which is scary enough and brings up new elements that never get explained and aren't even relevant to the "Doll Master mystery".
This isn't really explained AT ALL.
The producers of the show he explained were going on the premise of playing pranks on unsuspecting contestants to see how far they will go.
However, not only was this not developed (other than a two paragraph introduction), many things were not explained - i.e. the gypsies, the Anabaptists, the inquisitors and their relationship to the one true church.
Nor were the politics of the time explained, i.e. the relationship between the Catholic church and its supporters like the Holy Roman Emperor.
Why she spends so much time in this ghastly bathroom from hell is never explained.
The story itself is inconsistent and confusing, not everything is explained leaving the film to go from bad to worse.
Why Norwell wanted to complicate his life with an unknown factor like an adoptive child was never explained.
It's never explained, we're just supposed to go along with it.
In Dreams was a similar pretty movie with a serial killer which also wasn't the best, but at least the whys of how he killed the girls was explained.
It did not behave like a story and so much was injected into the movie (the pot brownies, the son was gay (?) the murder was justified, what possible reason could there be in the script for Linda aka Penelope to exist) that was never explained.
Brigitte Nielsen leads a bunch of ass-kicking warriors in various shapes and sizes to recover a green rock from some evil queen whose motives are never fully explained.
Seagal has a girlfriend in this movie who at the beginning of the film is with a psychic and she becomes haunted by visions, which by the end of the film are never explained and mean nothing.
Little is explained about their backgrounds and the things between the two young men happen at rapid speed (although, this I can understand because it's only 70 minutes or so).
It never even explained anything about the curse.
There's also talk about millions of dollars which apparently is tied in with this investigation but which is never explained.
The outcome of that sequence isn't explained, and Hugo's real estate dealings have nothing to do with the story.
If it was explained, though, I missed it completely.
Charlie's bounty hunter friend Ug (Terrence Mann) is now known as Counsellor Tetra & is a top ranking official at the intergalactic council & orders Charlie not to shoot the eggs but instead put them into a pod that will land nearby very soon, the pod does indeed land nearby very quickly & Charlie does indeed put the eggs into it but he is also caught in the pod which I presume cryogenic-ally freezes him as it's never really explained.
It seems that the writers threw together about five different stories and never fully explained any of them.
The owl's appearance was a never explained mystery and the train disappearing into thin air was too much.
The main plot in the movie is not explained nearly enough and the entire movie focused too much on Helen and Kazaf's growing relationship.
It's all pretty standard stuff for Hammer, but is handled with a good deal of visual elan, even if the central relationship, between psychoanalyst Porter and Rees, drives the narrative without ever being satisfactorily explained.
Even worse are the prequels, events of which were already explained in detail.
BackNext