Example collocations logo

Employment in sentence

3253 examples of Employment in a sentence

With the US economy already close to full employment, Trump’s fiscal stimulus will fuel inflation more than it does growth.
Third, this undesirable policy mix of excessively loose fiscal policy and tight monetary policy will tighten financial conditions, hurting blue-collar workers’ incomes and employment prospects.
That, together with increased access to capital, will help to accelerate the development of the services sector, which is needed to create urban employment.
As it stands, China’s economy follows, to some extent, the old Leninist “commanding heights” model, with the Party holding all political power and controlling major enterprises and sectors, even as the burgeoning private sector drives growth and employment.
First and foremost, it would reconcile a large state balance sheet with an expanding role for markets, bolstering employment, stimulating innovation, and advancing the economy’s structural transformation.
But those losses have been in low-wage positions, and have been offset by new employment in other areas.
Twenty-first-century globalization, driven by digitization and rapid changes in competitive advantage, can disrupt local industries, companies, and communities and cause job loss, even as it spurs greater productivity, boosts overall employment, and generates economy-wide gains.
A criminal record can negatively affect future employment, education, and ability to travel.
Given that agriculture amounts to roughly 30% of sub-Saharan Africa’s GDP, and accounts for more than 60% of employment in most African countries, the sector’s development could reduce poverty in the region substantially.
A vibrant rural sector can generate demand for locally produced goods and services, thereby stimulating sustainable employment growth in agro-processing, services, and small-scale manufacturing.
Moreover, embedding these values in European institutional arrangements demands no sacrifices in terms of long-term GDP growth and employment.
While expenditure for both is rising rapidly, the offsetting revenues are coming from ever fewer people in employment.
People who live longer while not being in employment want to enjoy their lives.
The new rules-of-origin (ROO) benchmark requiring that 75% of an imported vehicle be produced in North America (up from 62.5% under NAFTA) is likely to reduce employment by raising the costs of production.
This diversion, combined with the higher price of cars in the US, will further reduce overall US auto production, and thus auto-sector employment.
But in the long run, it will likely reduce US employment, shrink North America’s share of the global auto market, and undermine America’s credibility on international trade issues – all while failing to reduce the US current-account deficit.
The public sector continues to dominate most aspects of the economy, especially employment; about 70% of Saudi nationals work for the state.
In Mishel’s words, “if free-traders had actually cared about the working class, they could have supported a full range of policies to support robust wage growth: full employment, collective bargaining, high labor standards, a robust minimum wage, and so on.”
For once, over employment is politically justified.
Like all central banks, the Fed has a local mandate, focused on domestic price stability and employment.
But it should ensure that all participants in the labor force, whatever their status, enjoy equal access to essential benefits; and it should aim at minimizing the losses that impede mobility across firms, sectors, and types of employment.
For fairness as well as for efficiency reasons, rights and benefits should be attached to individuals, not to companies or employment status, and should be fully portable across sectors and jobs.
Points earned could be spent on lifelong education and professional training, which would thus become independent from employment status.
They should position themselves to capture from China “100 million labor-intensive manufacturing jobs; enough to more than quadruple manufacturing employment in low-income countries.”
How much inflation a society finds desirable or tolerable (taking into account other important variables, such as employment, GDP growth, or poverty) is an inherently political question that should be debated in parliament.
In the not-so-rich countries of the south, much inequality is the consequence of a more old-fashioned problem: lack of employment opportunities for the poor.
Put differently: not only take-home pay, but also employment opportunities can be unequally distributed.
And, within Latin America, Colombia and Brazil, among others, face a similar combination of low employment and high inequality.
The main victims of this state of affairs are women and the young, for whom employment ratios are much lower than for the population as a whole.
But educational reforms, however urgent and important, take a long time to bear fruit, whereas changes in employment can reduce inequality more quickly – and the effects can be large.
BackNext