Editing
in sentence
1058 examples of Editing in a sentence
With decent direction, editing, and musical score, this could have been a good movie, perhaps a dark version of Blake Edward's '10', instead of a weepy version of Ron Howard's 'Splash'.
Technically the film is OK, photography, music, special effects,
editing
and it's generally well made.
Editing: BAD!
Drably directed from a weak script, and additionally hampered by excessive cutting and poor editing, this film does provide some treasures among its eight songs, including the title number, and has nice turns by soprano Healy, Benny Rubin as a snack shop proprietor, and the dynamic tap dancing Roland Dupree.
And the creative use of a flashy
editing
really wears off after the hundredth time and the cutting off the dialog thing gets really annoying half-way.
The setting for the film is the week before Christmas, capstone of summer in the Antipodes, a dramatic background, but the links within the story are not smoothly compounded, resulting in the presentation of events that are rather difficult for a viewer to follow, a problem heightened by erratic editing, the mentioned heavy cutting, and poor sound and picture quality.
Thankfully the quality of the direction and
editing
improves significantly after the first half hour, but by then the damage has been done.
The plot has more holes than a pair of fishnet stockings and the direction and
editing
is astonishingly ham fisted.
There is no editing, no cut ins or close ups.
The only thing really praiseworthy about this project is the
editing.
Surveillance must have been dreamed up by persons in a drug induced stupor, with no writing ability, no directorial training, no experience in film editing, and a total lack of contact with reality.
The movie which stars Lowe, is a music video with few lines of dialogue, slow moving shots and poorly done
editing.
Wilderness" is loaded with ugly hardcore sex,forced incest and blatant racism.It's as politically incorrect as XXX roughies get.The score is stolen from seminal Hitchcock's horror classic "Psycho" and also "Jaws".The acting is hilariously awful,the
editing
is bad and there are some huge lapses in logic.The repetitive nature of the sex scenes grinds the movie after while so the brief running time is a blessing.The scenes of violence are quite nasty for example the hippie girl is stabbed with the machete in her groin and one can see blood on her crotch.3
Cinematography and
editing
are fine.
It feels he just shoot scenes and then joined them in some
editing
software!!! Music is of course good but the film doesn't need so many unwanted songs.
Every scene does not develop fully as if the
editing
room doesn't know how to do their job correctly.
It was nice that the killer's every moves were not telegraphed by the cliche's of 80's action movies, but come on, the only non-predictable move defies the plot and the set-up of the
editing.
If the bizarre casting (Wilfrid Brimley, Frankie Valli (!), Kaye Ballard and Armand Assante, among others) isn't enough to kill it, the stupefyingly inept direction, the washed-out photography (it looks like it was shot with a really cheap 16mm camera), the almost complete lack of
editing
(scenes either go on and on endlessly or are chopped off in the middle of a sentence), and Voight's embarrassing, apparently stream-of-consciousness "acting" are enough to bury it, which is exactly what should have been done with it.
The Tempe era features uniform Apple Mac
editing
and brutal hand-held camera filming, very much like a home movie.
The editing, done by director/writer/producer/make-up artist/gripper Latt, jumps all over the place, with some scenes repeated numerous times.
That doesn't include the writing, editing, directing or visual effects credits on other movies.
Those choices combined with the "C.S.I" editing, use of music and montage, lack of suspense, scares, or humor really drag this film down.
The
editing
is especially weak.
So much so that you don't feel bad for Caines character when his son gets murdered (which was actually mostly due to bad editing).
the photography is good, the costumes are good, but the
editing
is bad.
Possibly the worst camera-work, editing, lighting, sound, visual effects, music and fight choreography I have ever seen in a movie.
Especially bad is the editing; the poor way the story jumps from one point to another was amateurish and a huge distraction.
The movie had an effective title sequence, but what followed was pretty lame (flat, bad lighting, acting, editing, direction...).
The
editing
was extremely amateur and lazy.
No editing, poor script, weak acting and not much directing.
Back
Next
Related words
Acting
Movie
Direction
Music
Story
Cinematography
There
Script
Camera
Great
Really
About
Which
Could
Sound
Would
Writing
Scenes
Terrible
Photography