Example collocations logo

Editing in sentence

1058 examples of Editing in a sentence

The audio editing is horrible, They try too hard to come up with creative camera angles.
This movie has bad writing and bad editing.
first off, the editing i found too be pretty poor at times, the script(or what they had of one) was not very good, and if not for Nunzio La Bianca, the acting would have been crap.
Its also evidence of some of the worst editing I've seen, theres a terrible jump cut right in the middle of his "speech".
The editing alone is so jumbled you'll think it was assembled by a team of trained (poorly) monkeys, traveling across unpaved canyon road in the back of a jeep, blindfolded and drunk.
well, the writing was very sloppy, the directing was sloppier, and the editing made it worse (at least i hope it was the editing).
Story line was so-so but the filming, editing and acting were just plain bad.
With his tight editing, breakneck pacing , and wonderfully well known actors, you'd almost think you're watching...one of his home movies!
The editing is also annoying, very MTV stylized.
The progression of their relationship is erratically presented and this, coupled with choppy editing, leads the viewer to be less than assured as to what is transpiring, motivation being almost completely ignored in the writing.
There are some nasty editing cuts towards the end of the film especially during fight scenes and when the main character is chasing thru doors and runs into a patron.
looks like a 5th graders home movie project filmed with malfunctioning 8mm kiddie cameras . . . the editing appears to have been done by somebody having psychotic flashbacks (while on drugs and booze), with scenes cut short, followed by other, unrelated scenes, then chopped segments of scenes pasted in . . .
The editing is choppy.
The editing is very choppy at times as a scene seems to shift right in the middle.
cheap editing... saw the boom twice.
The acting was bad, the costumes (K Mart Skeletor outfit circa 1982) were worse, and the editing was awful.
Yet, for the enjoyment of a movie, one requires a believable plot, some pacing and editing, and a feeling of involvement.
The sequences were so poorly staged, the dubbing and editing absolutely horrible and this has to be Meryl's worst production.
Someone above mentioned about editing... well, they should have at least looked at the monitors while they were filming.
First off, the editing of this film consisted of one major flaw which I don't understand how was missed - you consistently see the overhead microphones bobbing in and out of the film.
Mix the most hammed performances from the most wooden actors, an abysmal script were every comment from all of the 'actors' sounded like it came from the same character and the most hurried editing that tried (and failed bigtime) to give the film a forced pace.
I saw this last night at the Tribeca Film Fest and holy god was it bad.. From the script to the editing to the acting to the cinematography-- none of it worked.
How much of this movie went on the editing room floor?
Not only is it poorly written, it is a product of shoddy direction and editing.
Script, acting, plot, direction and editing are all uniformly awful.
The script was forced, the acting was subpar and the editing annoying.
The acting was lame, the editing slipshod, and overall stupid.
BTW, near the beginning of the film, there are some weird cuts with the Ivan character that seem like a editing mistake, which made me laugh for a bit.
The whole movie seemed to suffer from poor editing - every scene seemed to take forever to unfold and when they did, I felt like I had waited a long time for very little to happen.
It has also got some editing problem on a couple of scene changes... but besides that is pretty decent.
BackNext