Decisions
in sentence
2964 examples of Decisions in a sentence
Indeed, Russia’s government, unexpectedly, has taken resolute and mostly correct economic
decisions.
Rather than fostering transparency, the government has tried to jeopardize projects like Diavgeia (the website on which all government
decisions
are supposed to be published).
People no longer think of parliaments as representing them and thus vested with the legitimacy needed to take
decisions
on their behalf.
But the wave of prosecutions that Xi has unleashed is discouraging Chinese officials from making decisions, owing to their fear that they could face criminal charges in the future.
And it is also a fact that we are happier saving and accumulating if we receive positive and negative feedback on our
decisions
on a time scale that allows us to believe that we can do better next time by altering our strategy – hence marketwatch.com
Incorporating sustainability forces governments and businesses to consider the environmental impact of their
decisions.
At the same time, an expansive reform effort cannot be advanced by economic
decisions
alone.
We should be examining how to make derivatives and repo investors assume the full risk of their
decisions
when dealing with systemically vital financial institutions.
Diversification of production took a back seat in policy
decisions
as commodity prices continued to fuel rapid growth.
Leaders need enough managerial skill to assure that systems are in place to provide the information required for good
decisions
as well as effective implementation.
An effective leader manages and shapes the context of
decisions
by creating and maintaining well-designed systems.
In this broad sense, organization and management refer to leaders’ ability to ensure an accurate inflow and outflow of information for making and implementing
decisions.
Dwight Eisenhower ran an efficiently organized presidency that some at the time believed lacked leadership, but historians later discovered his hidden hand behind most important
decisions.
What did help was to provide better incentives for good lending, by making creditors more responsible for the consequences of their
decisions.
Kohl led Europe, from agreement on the Maastricht Treaty in 1991 to critical
decisions
about the shape of the euro in 1998.
In their pioneering 2013 book Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much, Harvard’s Sendhil Mullainathan and Eldar Shafir of Princeton University examined the conditions under which people make
decisions
regarding how they manage their jobs, families, and lives.
Many took the opportunity, leading Mullainathan and Shafir to conclude that poor
decisions
can result from conditions of scarcity and stress.
It is a vicious cycle; the more the poor are deprived of resources, the more damaging their
decisions
can become.
Britain’s new program was championed as a way to reduce costs and incentivize better decisions, thereby moving more people into work and reducing benefit claims.
By reducing benefits received by the poor, the government is ensuring that scarcity surges and poor
decisions
multiply.
The idea of making all
decisions
unilaterally may sound nice, but it simply isn’t plausible in today’s integrated world.
The problem with this approach is that it is inequitable toward future generations, which, of course, have no say in
decisions
that we make today.
We need our central bankers to make complex
decisions
and to be able to balance potentially conflicting objectives.
Moreover, Macron has hardly helped himself with some of his
decisions
since taking office.
On the contrary, since the crisis began, Russia’s leaders have repeatedly contradicted their previous statements, backtracked, reversed decisions, and denied easily verifiable facts.
All of this indicates that Russian political leaders have no strategy and do not foresee the consequences of their
decisions.
It is also clear that the
decisions
to violate international law, despite the risk of economic isolation, were made in an ad hoc fashion by Putin’s innermost circle.
And will China’s coastal export interests again prevail in exchange rate policy decisions, at the expense of poor inland consumers?
But it is difficult to see how the labor market can be efficient if employers are making hiring
decisions
on the basis of political favoritism rather than merit.
But those macroeconomic outcomes result from policy
decisions
abroad and the market-clearing movements of financial prices.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
About
Which
Making
Policy
Political
People
Should
Would
Economic
Investment
Taken
Other
Could
Government
Important
There
Countries
Where
Governments