Example collocations logo

Danger in sentence

2182 examples of Danger in a sentence

Because ever-looser monetary policy alone is decreasingly effective beyond some point, it can be partly reversed with little danger to nominal demand; and slightly higher interest rates would temper, even if only mildly, the inegalitarian impact of the current policy mix.
But I suspect that a greater danger lies elsewhere, with the practical men and women employed in the policymaking functions of central banks, regulatory agencies, governments, and financial institutions’ risk-management departments tending to gravitate to simplified versions of the dominant beliefs of economists who are, in fact, very much alive.
It would spare America and the world, in the words of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, "the danger that Iraq's weapons of mass terror could fall into the hands of terrorists."
Belgium is slipping into the danger zone.
There is a danger that in the push to nationalize banks as a consequence of the financial crisis, governments will see it as their duty to implement strategies.
For the danger is that the government will not, as its critics fear, destroy South Korea's distinctive economy through reformist zeal.
Russia for RacistsMOSCOW – In Russia, if you have dark hair and a slightly swarthy complexion, you are likely to be in danger.
I consider this ideology to be the greatest danger that the world will face in the next decade.
What can bind China and the US together, given that the shared Soviet threat no longer exists, and that a considerable part of both countries’ elites regard the other side as the main source of danger?
Developed countries, meanwhile, have an opportunity to narrow the gap between average and best practices, and to avoid the danger of secular stagnation.
Add to this a second psychological bias neuroscientists are discussing: because our species has evolved to fend off danger, we tend to be more sensitive to bad news.
Better that they embrace loftier rationales, one of which is the supposed danger of “short-termism.”
Accordingly, the international community must be willing to intervene in countries where the government poses a danger to its own population.
The vision remains attractive, but in its moral seductiveness lies profound moral and intellectual danger.
It is no use lamenting the real danger of nuclear proliferation, while in practice standing idle as the Non-Proliferation Treaty falls apart.
If that is his intention, it is a move fraught with great danger.
But there is a larger danger in using the law to police what people think.
That danger underlies the view, still operative in the US, that opinions, however obnoxious, should be freely expressible, so that they can be opposed by counter-arguments.
That would be a price worth paying if it contributed to a dynamic that over time reduced both the suffering of the Syrian people and the danger posed by the Islamic State.
One danger inherent in pushing for high growth is that it is always possible to juice an economy with short-term measures that encourage a lot of risk-taking and leverage in the financial system.
Few in the US seem to have Graham’s stomach for military action that would put 20 million South Koreans in imminent danger.
Still others, highlighting the rise of virulent right-wing populism in the United States and parts of Europe, declare that the real danger lies within.
While nobody knows exactly what this danger level is, it is clear where the alarm starts to arise.
Given the enormous cost of a default, any government should stay far away from the danger zone.
The second prescription assumes that if, for any reason, a country does end up in the danger zone, only two responses make economic sense.
That is why countries build up debt levels that put them in the danger zone.
The European Stability and Growth Pact was an effort to accomplish exactly that – by creating incentives for eurozone countries to steer clear of the danger zone for debt.
But German politicians are aware that unemployment is 2.5 times higher in France than at home, raising the danger that transfers would all go one way.
And yet, the opposite is more likely, with domestic inflation – a danger aggravated by central banks’ loosening of money supply to help commercial banks – bringing the threat of higher interest rates.
Such terms provoke fear that, once confidence in any one country is lost, all others are in danger.
BackNext