Creating
in sentence
3274 examples of Creating in a sentence
Director David Lynch refuses to give clear explanations on his movies(with the exceptions of The Elephant Man and The Straight Story)and he prefers the spectator to making the homework of taking out conclusions.I like a lot the films he does but I do not try to find in them a clear explanation.I just enjoy the extraordinary talent Lynch has of
creating
emotions and producing feelings without a too coherent story.He uses all the instruments to give us something unique which we may not understand it immediately but something which we will never forget.Inland Empire is a very interesting experiment and we can see the same surrealistic style he used on most of his movies.After Eraserhead,his brilliant first film,Lynch continued with more normal films,like The Elephant Man or Dune.But,with Blue Velvet,he backed to show the oneiric feeling he had shown in Eraserhead (although on a lesser degree).With Inland Empire,I had the perfect sensation I was in a dream(or,best said,on a nightmare).But this film is not for everyone:its running time is of 3 hours.Lynch plays with our perception in the time and the reality to create a very interesting experience but which will not satisfy to the people who are looking for a clear story.Lynch makes us taking out conclusions all the time.The film is made with a digital video and that thing helps because it creates more mystery.Laura Dern brings an amazing performance.She always acted well but I never thought she had so much talent.I do not know if I can recommend Inland Empire to everyone:I liked it pretty much and I think it's a very interesting experiment.But I understand some people will not like it.Inland Empire is very interesting and it makes us taking out conclusions.And I always appreciate that.
Dr. Charles Forbin(Eric Braeden)puts his life's work into
creating
a super intelligent computer that links up with a similar machine created by the U.S.S.R. and tries to hold the world hostage.
Recycled cheap laughs (singing in the bathroom) are just stupid and the whole movie seems like a commercial for a certain musician who in my opinion is just as good at
creating
moving songs as this movie is at getting good reviews.
It introduces Woody Allen as a complete neurotic who can't seem to look at the open doors all around him and prefers to consult an analyst -- be it an actual psychiatrist or us, the viewer -- and whine about his inability to relate to the little things in life without
creating
some turbulent drama complete with hoots and clicks.
Benton's sharp screenplay is sensational in
creating
colorful, likable, and original characters.
It is interesting that in spite of the damage done by Reavis, the film is sympathetic to him,
creating
a happy ending, which was not even true, because Reavis died alone in a shack.
Mediocre zero budget wannabe grindhouse horror flick, written by none other than Ted Mikels and Arch "Eegah!" Hall, about cat food manufacturers over acting outrageously and using human cadavers as the secret ingredient in the most popular cat food in town, and thus
creating
a horde of (or at least one or two) bloodthirsty kitties.
Writer/director/producer Greg Lamberson's first stab
creating
his own low-budget horror film comes across as a cross between "Street Trash" and "the Stuff" while being not quite as entertaining as either of the two aforementioned movies.
Lovecraft drops barely enough information about the world he's
creating
to keep you hooked.
Just like Poseidon and Pink Panther, it's clear Hollywood just wanted to cash in on nostalgia instead of
creating
quality, original concepts.
What's more, no imagination has been put in
creating
the evil spirit here.
Without the degrading advantage of CGI or Computer Aided Special Effects the story rules here with some minor available technology of the day
creating
a story as much in your head as it is in your eyes.
Few directors have succeeded in
creating
a truly personal cinematic poetry of their own.
'Kekelixi' ('Mountain Patrol') is one of those quiet, quasi-documentary films that now and then rises out of nowhere and has such an impact on the viewer that it has the potential for
creating
some global change action.
Director Gary Winick ought to be ashamed of himself for
creating
such utter garbage as this and spitting on cinema's potential.
In this subtle, yet unsettling compilation of "home movies" created by Wayne & Andrea Montgomery, filmmaker Anthony Spadaccini affirms his instinctive aptitude for
creating
both a successful cinematic showpiece and an unnerving playground for his actors to perform.
With the technology thats available today for
creating
believable CGI effects, it inexcusable to release such a sub standard movies, especially when it seems to be released on the back of the New blockbuster "KING KONG".
While not a faithful adaptation of the children's book, it did a fantastic job of capturing my imagination as a young child and
creating
new wonderful adventures in my mind.
This movie was written directly for the screen by Neil Simon, and his mastery of
creating
a hilarious but also surreal story perfectly works in this uproarious comedy.
For example the shots of the 'haunted' house might have been melodramatic and cliché, however this recurring image was often offset with the wheeling stars overhead,
creating
an ethereal quality that set it apart.
When you watch this movie, you have a sense of magic and a sense of sadness at the same time, because the Beatles were about to break up, and yet
creating
great new music at the same time.
I so much admire the skill of
creating
such a masterpiece; it's like depicting one's dream to become reality.
As a movie director and producer
creating
a movie can be either really easy or really hard, but these guys definitely make it look easy.
I have no problem in
creating
epics with a touch of unrealism.
So this is the trick to the film; if one doesn't know how to see with the heart, or if the film doesn't touch one's heart
creating
an explosion that obliges the heart to start "seeing" independently of whether we want to or not, then the film will appear as a mediocre whatever thing.
This movie walks you straight into the heart of India with its high family values and wonderful way of
creating
something functional out of anything available.
There has been several films made in several countries around the basic theme: in an evil system it's the oppressors that are responsible for
creating
criminals, who are actually themselves victims of a faulty society, therefore criminals should be set free and the system overturn - a new, better system shall come in which, by default, there will be no crime because we won't have any cause for it.
When watching this movie you must remember two things: First, the film director's main goal was to tape and capture the Beatles
creating
an album from start to finish and that they would take all the footage and edit it down.
Instead of
creating
an interesting in-depth documentary on the PMRC hearings the brains down at VH1 thought a made-for-tv comedy would be more interesting.
Shot very effectively in a style somewhere between Italian neo-realism, early Scorsese and even Cassavettes improv but with a flavor all its own, it doesn't matter that one of the plot twists is very obvious (so obvious, in fact, I'm not even sure that it's even meant to be a twist) because co-writer Paddy Considine is such a riveting yet natural presence in the lead: he's able to be genuinely threatening while keeping it absolutely real,
creating
a very believable monster.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Would
Their
Countries
World
Could
About
Economic
People
While
Other
Global
Growth
Market
There
Where
Political
Government
System
Should
