Example collocations logo

Corporations in sentence

1132 examples of Corporations in a sentence

But any change in the terms and dates of the election will inevitably lead to the formation of a more severe, more closed political regime, one orientated towards the creation of the "state capitalism" economic model, with near total state control in the financial sphere and an economy dominated by vertically organized large state-owned or state-controlled corporations.
The flavor of the week in Rio is “sustainability indexing” for corporations, by way of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Corporations can, of course, be asked to conform to a “don’t” list – don’t dump mercury into rivers, don’t employ children for hazardous tasks, etc.
At a time when the world is emphasizing the importance of diversity and tolerance, it is effrontery to suggest that corporations should standardize their notion of how they wish to promote good in the world.
Putin’s regime may be described as a group of clans, consisting of state-dominated corporations, such as Gazprom, Rosneft, Vneshtorgbank, Rosoboronexport, and the Russian Railways, together with the security agencies.
He continued,“Our capital markets are sufficiently sophisticated and sufficiently deep that most large corporations have plenty of alternative ways to find capital.
Sisi, like former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, is wary of allowing private-sector players to gain political clout, and has instead propped up cronies whom he can trust, such as army corporations and some of the firms previously connected to the Mubarak regime.
Looking beyond the US and European voters who are suffering from deindustrialization, the fact is that China is not the gold mine it was once perceived to be for American corporations.
Similarly, in the Philippines, financial liberalization, by and large, benefited large family-owned corporations, increasing their monopoly power by easing access to bank credit.
Local banks and corporations would never again overborrow, knowing that no safety net would catch them when they fell.
A necessary step is to abandon convertibility and let the peso float, while transforming outstanding obligations to pesos so as to prevent the devaluation from wrecking the balance sheets of local banks and corporations.
One in five listed corporations carries gross leverage of more than eight times equity and earns less than two times interest coverage, weakening considerably these companies’ resilience to growth shocks.
Instead, it should continue to take the small steps needed to allow market forces to discipline workers, corporations, banks, and governments.
However, many giant cultural corporations - Japanese-owned Sony, Canadian-owned Seagram, Murdoch's empire or Germany's Bertelsmann - are no longer American, even though they promote American cultural models.
Moreover, tax competition drives market concentration and monopolization, because it tilts the playing field in favor of incumbent multinational corporations, and against smaller potential competitors.
Corporations are already sitting on a sizeable cash surplus; but, rather than invest in workers, equipment, or research and development, they have been buying back their own shares.
At best, many corporations are profiting from “distributional” activities that extract existing wealth from the economy.
But US universities found a way to integrate competition’s benefits into the European concept of nonprofit, or so-called eleemosynary, corporations.
No day passes without major headlines of big mergers in Europe;Germany is ablaze as its mammoth corporations are performing mating rites.
As Big Data becomes more accessible to governments and multinational corporations, our personal information is being increasingly compromised.
In large corporations, it is often difficult to ascertain the contribution of any individual.
Such corporations are rife with “agency” problems: while decision-makers (CEO’s) are supposed to act on behalf of their shareholders, they have enormous discretion to advance their own interests – and they often do.
The Education Commission’s first proposal is to count on “philanthropists, corporations, and charitable organizations” to increase their annual aid contributions from $2 billion today to $20 billion by 2030.
Politicians like Hillary Clinton in the United States are promising that they can cajole large corporations into paying higher wages.
While social philanthropy by individuals or corporations is of course important, it has a fundamental limitation.
Indeed, should the global economy deteriorate further, outward portfolio investment could accelerate, reducing the financing available to Brazilian corporations and eventually affecting their ability to invest.
In 2008-2009, the CBR pursued a policy of gradual devaluation, bailing out all big state-owned and private corporations, regardless of their performance.
Political leaders who have a purely private-sector background tend to take a more short-term approach than leaders with experience in public service, not least because most markets produce incentives for corporations to emphasize quarterly and yearly profits and share prices above all else.
Their version of tax reform would mean reducing deductions for the wealthy and corporations, with no rate reductions.
The same can be said of corporations and governments.
Back