Example collocations logo

Convincing in sentence

1149 examples of Convincing in a sentence

The cast and locations were pretty convincing, as was sense of tawdry, sleazy amorality which is the reality of crime.
Rodman can't even pretend he knows martial arts, John Pinette's stunt double was more convincing than Rodman.
Nevertheless, it was thoroughly convincing as a depiction of the few central characters and absorbing in its unremitting sadism.
The story is intriguing, the acting is convincing, the dialogue is intelligent, and the direction basic but apt.
Such waste of time both for makers and viewers of the movie .The movie tries to follow clichés of both genres but the result is not convincing like the guy who stipends relieving of his virginity, and more unbelievable that is the caring and responsible alien type who think for a species that their survival is based on their distinction.
Cam'ron I guess is supposed to be playing himself , but he's not very good or convincing as himself which is sort of sad.
She meets Baron von Geigern (John Barrymore) a hotel thief who inadvertently is in her room (having been in the process of stealing some jewelry) when she is about to commit suicide, and stays the night with her, convincing her not to end things.
Shimura and Mifune as the wise, old cop and the young, earnest rookie are absolutely convincing and completely mesmerizing.
The cast, consisting mainly of unknown actors and actresses for the most part perfectly fit their complex roles(special acknowledgment ought to go to Jason Carns, in the lead, for he is just as convincing as any Hollywood bag guy).Continuity wise there are a few holes and gaps, but they are so small and insignificant that they can be overlooked, and are even forgotten over the course of the entire film.
As Good as it Gets is a very funny movie, filled with great acting and lines that always hit the mark p-e-r-f-e-c-t-l-y... Jack Nicholson is absolutely perfect, and Helen Hunt proves that she can do better than playing in Twister... Greg Kinnear is also very convincing in his role.
Entertaining, engaging characters and convincing cast.
Stunningly beautiful Hedy Lamarr (who was actually a serious intellect offscreen) is surprisingly convincing as a ditz who is blithely unaware of the effect her obsession with astrology is having on her long-suffering professor/astronomer husband (Powell).
The FX are not very convincing, although may be unpleasant for the casual horror fan.
The 'exteriors' are obviously interior studio sets, and not very convincing ones.
It has a LOT of bad acting, stupid plotlines and really doesn't do the job of convincing young men (note I say young men: seems that back when this was made, it wasn't all right for young women to do this.) to take industrial arts courses.
The finale is a bit of a let down, though, even if the involvement of the titular woods is fun to see (thanks also to some convincing CGI, not the second-rate crap that often destroys the atmosphere in these small-budgeted movies).
I love his ability to be so arrogant and yet so witty and convincing.
The characters are convincing, even if some of the action isn't.
Why do these meteors and asteroids always aim for the well-known cities? 7) It should have been more devastating; they showed it's impact to be more like that of a huge earthquake than a meteor, 8) the absurdity that governments would actually think about politics when the future of the entire planet is at stake - and that they actually need convincing that warheads need to be used?!
The loss of the hero's friend isn't overly convincing or deserving of much mourning, and the exchange student scene at the sorority house is slightly unnerving, but on the whole, this is a fun flick worth watching once.
The two actors playing the sons are also very convincing.
The best part about the movie was probably the performance of old civil war veteran William Demarest who is very convincing in his crusty old sidekick backup role.
The rage and anger presented here is convincing, but the cause is confusing.
it showed how the Jesuits convinced the Hurons in the end to be baptized by convincing them that they would be healed of their sickness if they accepted God and also it showed how the Jesuits did not claim the responsibility of the foreign diseases brought over from the Old World but blamed it on the Native's lack of Christianity.
The actors didn't even seem convincing, so either this is because they are just that bad OR the director doesn't know how to help anything.
I like the comments from CPB and PBS ombudsmen following an investigation into its airing on PBS, an allegedly non-partisan public channel: Using the words "slanted" and "no hint of balance," in the report, CPB Ombudsman Ken A. Bode concluded, "The producers apparently do not subscribe to the idea that an argument can be made more convincing by giving the other side a fair presentation."
I admit this film in many aspects was quite hideous, but because Jeff Goldblums and Geena Davis' acting was so proper and convincing, this is what made the film into what it is.
Most, but not every actor was convincing (Nigel Havers and Amelia Shankley were excellent).
Shirley Temple, Liesel Matthews and Amelia Shankley (this version) are all convincing as the kind-hearted but strong-willed Sara, which was exactly what Sara was.
The movie tries to imitate the British action very sophisticated films like Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels by an unexpected ending and by the plot twist in favor of the main characters, but they obviously fail.The actors aren't real and they don't do a very convincing interpretation.
BackNext