Example collocations logo

Characters in sentence

10488 examples of Characters in a sentence

They aren't even actors playing characters.
In The Tempest, Jarman does very little with the script or the characters, using them as simply a lattice to hang a very long and well-constructed cinematographic frame.
We really see into some of the characters feelings and past and get to know them all quite well, so the audience may gain some emotions for them.
The four main characters are unknown actors and I don't remember seeing any of them in another movie.
It's only redeeming features were some of the characters.
The Chemist and The DJ were pretty fun characters.
You can picture many of the minor characters being cast this way: "Hey, me and some other guys I know are going to be in a movie.
The characters was as unoriginal it hurts.
The only way the characters could love this house is if their previous homes had been ghastly.
The acting was bad, the characters where unbelievable and the time jumps were crazy.
Nothing of the books is in this film except the setting and characters, and they are wasted on a plot thin enough through which to read the silly script.
The plot was believeable enough (although some of the characters' actions seemed very, very RANDOM), the script was fairly well written (in that the dialogue did not seem forced), but everything went way too slowly.
The characters are very shallow and stereo-typed, I would have liked to see more depth there.
Both of the main female characters have so obviously had boob-jobs, and it brings the characters down, being one female is a respected member of police, whilst the other is the sweet, "innocent" daughter of the towns sheriff.
The characters Derek and Slovak were the best actors.
Unfortunately the flick seems to suffer from bad direction as it slogs through legal minutia while trying to weave some kind of story with a handful of foul mouthed and poorly portrayed characters only to end abruptly.
Bad points; the writers try to do good science but it falls down in direction and production (eg, a rock drilling mole using superheated rock drilling equipment breaks surface underwater with nary a bubble or boiling cauldron to be seen), the characters are cliché's and the plot unfolding is pretty stock standard.
I enjoy seeing a few fictional characters added to add some color to a well known story.
But the serious lack of character development left us not really liking or caring about any of the characters, especially the musicologist!
David Healy is an unmemorable but, given the circumstances, acceptable Watson, and is not too much of a buffoon... at least not more than the rest of characters.
Characters have no drive, motivation, or reason for us to care about them.
all i got from this film was clichéd characters, contrived dialog and an unemotional script.
The story is disconnected and it is difficult to understand what is going on or the reason for the characters' actions.
A cheesy "B" crime thriller of the early '50, the story is droll, the characters wooden, Allison Hayes and Abbe Lane are the only two sexpots that make it an eye-catcher, but one short shot, only a few frames long, shows an "el" train crossing the river on the State Street bridge, of the 6000 series Pullman-built cars painted in their original 1950 paint scheme, as they were delivered when new in 1950.
Why? Are they in our time -the same time as the characters?
I kept on praying for moments where I would feel any sort of connection with any of the characters, but that never happened.
Most of the characters performances were just not very convincing.
My main objection was the lack of foundation for the relationship between the two main characters, I was never convinced that they were close.
Characters are one-dimensional, even the good guys and especially the bad guys.
The man who gave us Splash, Cocoon and Parenthood gave us this incoherent muddle of cliched characters, poor plotting, you've-got-to-be-kidding dialogue and melodramatic acting?
BackNext