Benefits
in sentence
4904 examples of Benefits in a sentence
Friz Freleng's 'Big House Bunny
' benefits
greatly from a good script by Tedd Pierce.
The range of (at the time) operating medical and CB radio procedures and terminology, the open identification with real-time Los Angeles and the range of rescue situations faced by Station 51 and their paramedics showed how thorough Jack Webb's research and commitment to authenticity was, pushing the
benefits
of the paramedic program in the face of a skeptical California state government; as a concerned West Coast citizen with an eye on the Big One he probably knew this was an important step forward in public health that would save many, many lives when that day inevitably arrived.
Terrorism is just murder on a grand scale, and murder
benefits
no one.
It
benefits
from a provocative story, interesting collection of characters, the charm of a period setting, and several philosophical and social musings, all worthy of consideration.
On the contrary, the initial
benefits
that peasants gained from the rural reforms of the late 1970's and early 1980's have disappeared; real income among farmers has dropped in recent years as their production costs rise and agricultural prices decline.
Does all of this amount to a serious threat to the
benefits
of globalization?
If Spain leads the way, all of Europe will ultimately reap the
benefits.
These rules provide reciprocal
benefits
and are thus largely self-enforcing.
For example, the U.S. government intervenes in Haiti to avoid a flood of refugees and imposes sanctions on Cuba because of domestic political
benefits.
At this point, it is far from obvious that the humanitarian
benefits
of NATO's intervention will outweigh the costs of the intervention -- costs measured in lives lost as a result of NATO acts and in the larger danger that the intervention poses to international order.
Yet investing in girls has long-term
benefits
that can transform communities and eradicate poverty.
When it comes to tackling high-impact health challenges like the proliferation of fake or inferior drugs, local solutions and local innovations are not only likely to be central to any successful effort; they have the potential to provide
benefits
that go far beyond the scope of the original problem.
Indeed, by nurturing an inclusive culture of research, local innovation has the potential to provide
benefits
that extend far beyond the specific problem that is being addressed.
Global integration brought tremendous benefits: the international division of labor, which are so clearly proved by the theory of comparative advantage; dynamic
benefits
such as economies of scale and the rapid spread of innovations from one country to another, which are less easy to demonstrate by static equilibrium theory; and noneconomic
benefits
such as the freedom of choice associated with the international movement of goods, capital, and people, and the freedom of thought associated with the international movement of ideas.
By focusing on these problems I am not trying to belittle globalization’s
benefits.
These benefits, I believe, can be sustained only by deliberate and persistent efforts to correct and contain the system’s deficiencies.
The
benefits
of global capitalism are unevenly distributed.
It exerts attraction through the
benefits
if offers and, simultaneously, it imposes tremendous penalties on countries that seek to withdraw.
A better understanding of the various issues and possible remedies could enable science to flourish again in the Muslim world, with far-reaching
benefits
for its economies and societies.
But the reality is that such efforts will produce more real-world
benefits
than a single-minded focus on publication, which can inadvertently encourage plagiarism and junk science.
If money were neutral, this would be just a question of whether the
benefits
of using money outweigh the financial costs.
In general, there is a tendency to overestimate the economic
benefits
of big infrastructure projects in countries riddled by poor governance and corruption, and to underestimate the long-run social costs of having to repay loans whether or not promised revenues materialize.
Rent-seeking tends to lead to policy failure in the form of intense political competition aimed at gaining short-term access to revenues and benefits, as opposed to political competition over what policies might be in the long-term public interest.
The Fed’s experience – shaped by a historically decentralized power structure – highlights the
benefits
of a policymaking process characterized by diverse views.
America’s new problem is long-term unemployment, which affects nearly 40% of those without jobs, compounded by one of the poorest unemployment-insurance systems among advanced countries, with
benefits
normally expiring after 26 weeks.
During downturns, the US Congress extends these benefits, recognizing that individuals are unemployed not because they are not looking for work, but because there are no jobs.
But now congressional Republicans are refusing to adapt the unemployment system to this reality; as Congress went into recess for the holidays, it gave the long-term unemployed the equivalent of a pink slip: as 2014 begins, the roughly 1.3 million Americans who lost their unemployment
benefits
at the end of December have been left to their own devices.
In the meantime, normalizing relations with Cuba could have far-reaching
benefits.
To avoid losing these benefits, much more must be done to recapture public support for growth-enhancing deals like the TTIP.
A limited agreement would not only fail to bring these benefits; it could actually undercut the weight and influence of the transatlantic community, by signaling weakness and ceding rulemaking to other forums.
Back
Next
Related words
Would
Economic
Costs
Their
Which
Countries
Social
Other
Could
While
People
Growth
Trade
Should
There
Health
About
Global
World
Unemployment
