Belongs
in sentence
538 examples of Belongs in a sentence
Obviously a low cost budget movie, which should have done every-one a favour and stayed in 1978 where it
belongs
- Old and unwanted.
There's two types of Giallo; namely, urban and rural; and this one
belongs
to the urban side of the equation.
His friend Mark (Andrew Stevens)
belongs
to a gang of bullies, Craig (Steve Bond), Paul (Damon Douglas) and Bruce (Ray Underwood).
Mars
belongs
in that same bad sci-fi vein as PRECIOUS FIND, but at least that one was fun 'cause it didn't take itself seriously.
This guy, on the other hand
belongs
in the Press area of a European Blondie Reunion concert, holding a Poloroid camera.
TCM broadcast this film in a grouping of Valentino films but the film really
belongs
to Mae Murray.
Also, in the book Crown Jewel
belongs
to Carey, not to Ken.
I needed that extra thumb to point straight down to the depths of hades where this monstrosity
belongs.
George Macready, who
belongs
in things like "Gilda" rather than oaters like this, kept getting shoved into Randolph Scott Westerns (four of them).
The cartoon is nearly stolen by a stammering hillbilly bird and his laboured rendition of Simple Simon but ultimately 'I Love to Singa
' belongs
to Owl Jolson, a character who manages to be cute without being cloying.
In this film Beethoven meets up with a girl friend named Missy, who
belongs
to a nice man.
Because this show definitely
belongs
in the dustbin!!
This South Korean thriller undoubtedly
belongs
to the most impressive genre films of the last years and stands in one line with classics like "Seven" or "The Silence of the Lambs".
Dumb and Dumber is the funniest movie ever for the following reasons: two pals lose their jobs, but Lloyd (Jim Carrey) finds a briefcase that
belongs
to a wealthy woman (Lauren Holly) that lives in Aspen,Colorado and he and his best friend Harry (Jeff Daniels)must travel cross-country to return it to her.
Boogeyman 2 is the sequel to one of the worst horror films I have seen during the last 10 years.This sequel is better than the first part...but it also is a pathetic crap.Besides the good presence from Tobin Bell and Reneé O' Connor,there is nothing to recommend in Boogeyman 2.The screenplay is horribly bad,the characters are completely generic and the movie is tremendously tedious from its first scene to its last one.Jeff Betancourt,who was the editor of some very competent movies (like The Good Girl or The Ruins),made his first work as a director in this movie,and it would be better if he goes back to editing movies,because the direction from Boogeyman 2 is pathetic for many reasons,but mainly,because it never finds a good tone and it is very chaotic.Boogeyman 2
belongs
to the worst kind of horror cinema and I suggest you to avoid this big piece of crap.As I said,it's better (or,more properly,less bad) than the first part,but it's still unbearable and painful to watch.
After you've lived in a system in which you may have paid 40 dollars for rent, 5 for telephone or 10 for electricity, it becomes completely absurd when your bills take most of your salary, as in the Capitalist society most of us live in, to pay for the wealth of the Earth that
belongs
to every single soul on this planet.
Here i turned off the movie and threw it out in the garbage where it belongs...i vote it 2
What was probably the last "big" news "erotic" film before video took over and the porno industry went where it belongs, on the home VCR, "Curse of Debbie Does Dallas" (just like some old porno films, they have changed the name of the documentary to re-market it) could have made an interesting jumping point for a discussion on the porno industry, the country that supports it and the psychology that drives it.
I have longed to see this series again and think 26 years is too long to have to wait ... the series now
belongs
to that era of classic video-taped programmes that we no longer see.
This is definitely one of the scariest movies ever and also
belongs
to my top ten horror films!
Impossible to watch through 21st century eyes,"Sanders of the river
" belongs
to the "Saturday Morning Pictures" school of movies.I saw dozens like it in my local Odeon (Our Dominion Extends Over Nations) as a small boy.Wise white man benevolently ruling over spear waving savages,chattering monkeys,trumpeting elephants,and other denizens of the Dark Continent.Most of the savages had bones through their noses and danced round the cooking pot chanting gibberish.They were badly-made,with unsteady scenery,crackling soundtracks and startling inadvertent jump-cuts.Nobody you ever heard of was in them and we forgot about them as soon as we got out into the daylight.
I got a possible explanation of this peculiar storyline, which is that they all were experiencing a 'paradigm shift' of reality itself, in which the forces of life and death, order and chaos, good and evil, arranged catastrophic events around them, because like the calm eye of a hurricane, it was required that they all survive in a central zone of safety while the whole world shifted around them, apparently because they were all 'prime movers' in the future history of humanity,(this
belongs
on the SciFi Channel) which the forces of darkness were trying to eliminate, while the forces of good shielded them, noticeably with 'Pre-Javu', the opposite of 'De Javu' where you flash backwards in time, they 'flashed forward' to get a heads up of their immediate future to avoid it subtily.
It
belongs
in that small but distinguished genre of Movies About Food.
Overall, I'm not surprised at all that this film is not better known and gathering dust on an old video shelf is really where it
belongs.
Why mock a person with no talent and make her Asian, who
belongs
in Chinatown to a buffoon-like family of kung fu artists.
This is a very-much copied western which
belongs
technically to the category of Randolph Scott westerns; this large and interesting body of work itself should be divided I suggest into the 1940s B/W series, and the 1950s color series; this is one of the earlier color efforts, an expensive-looking production but with somewhat inconsistent color.
Okay - I realize this movie
belongs
to a genre that is, for the most part, immune to scrutiny.
I believe this acting style
belongs
in a theater...but in a high school theater.
Mark Linn Baker does a good job as Benjy but this film
belongs
solely to Peter O Toole who plays the alcoholic Allan Swann perfectly.This may well be because the role mirrored his own life in so many ways.
But the most spellbinding character
belongs
to Christopher Plummer, who steals every scene he's in with an astounding take on Mike Wallace.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Where
Movie
There
Other
World
About
Would
Movies
Really
Their
People
Family
Category
Something
First
Films
Group
Still
Place
