Apart
in sentence
1960 examples of Apart in a sentence
People whom have called this film "fun" are basically saying that they wouldn't mind if someone ripped
apart
their final work and turned it into one of the worst movies of all time, only saved by those who enjoy it for being entertaining.
And this is not necessarily a bad thing
(apart
from the lousy acting by Ralston), as the movie is highly entertaining.
Apart
from the many differences mentioned above, this film doesn't seem to have a negative view of men (in Entre Nous, the male leads were all Neanderthals), but portrays the mother in the story as a self-absorbed woman whose kids seemed to be an afterthought--her new boy-toy was about 90% of her focus.
Apart
from the film's American title change, the print was edited drastically (and in some cases incoherently) resulting in an uneven and less enjoyable film than the one that those lucky audiences in Britain were able to see when the film had its UK premiere in 1947.
I'd like to give this 10 stars for sheer inventiveness and audacity not to mention a brilliant eye, but for me it didn't quite work totally as a film, falling
apart
slightly towards the end.
Before commenting on the film as a whole, I want to make that clear, because in the inevitable rush to pick this film
apart
(the plot, the voices, the religious significance, the literary accuracy, the moral issues, the music, the comparisons with Disney and de Mille, etc...) one might easily become distracted from the aesthetic and technical triumphs of The Prince of Egypt, and that would be unfortunate.
If I ever saw Scrappy again, it would be the last, he has so got to die!
Apart
from that though, not bad.
just when you think the storyline is going to pick up they start showing you flashbacks of scenes earlier in the movie which you've already scene a thousand times !!, Tamzin Outhwaite does OK with the little characterization she is given,
apart
from spitting out some cheesy cockney lines god knows where they picked up from and looking pretty she isn't asked to do much else.
Satellites are shown post-war, blown
apart
in a tangled mass resembling a fallen space station.
With such sentimental authors like Dickens it is difficult to know when you are criticising the director and when the author, and I find it almost impossible to keep them
apart
in my evaluation of this mini.
The film had very little idea of narrative flow and jumped around from point to point haphazardly throughout, but especially towards the end which just about falls
apart.
We have a bittersweet, ironic story of an individual 'coming of age' as her group of friends breaks
apart.
The story is good
apart
from the aliens.
The acting is terrible, the dialogue is dreadful, the special effects don't do anything, and the story is one of the least interesting ever,
apart
from maybe fans of the series, no-one is going to enjoy a lacklustre horror like this.
The wife finds evidence of him cheating,, confronts him,, and well the sparks do fly in this one, it's hard to say more without giving away what happens later, so i won't do that, but this is a very intriguing movie that delves deep into what can tear families apart, definitely worth a watch if you ask me.
Towards the end, Ernest can't handle being with either of them, and after they co-operate, and Ernest finally dies (naturally), it ends with them finally falling apart, but Madeline still gets a good final line.
The acting is very good, even though I haven't heard of them
apart
from Lambert.
In an rather tired and often exploiting genre, this film really stands
apart
as an example of the value of depth in characters, theme and story no matter how two dimensional the tracking story might be.
I love the whole bizarre set up, the weird coincidences (for example the piece of newspaper stuck on his arm which talks about a man being ripped
apart
by vigilantes in the very area he can't get away from - and then the weird woman says 'I'll burn it off' - yet more reference to burns) Love the 'Berlin club', and the idea of the plaster of Paris cream cheese bagel paper weights - so evocative of that pretentious era!
Martin and Steve Railsback are the loving California couple who are ripped
apart
by cocaine, but Railsback--a somewhat over-eager actor with wildly active eyes and tics--was fundamentally wrong for the role of an "ordinary" man who gets hooked on coke and loses control (the viewer can easily see Railsback was over-wound to begin with).
The only redeeming value of the film is the high level of realism and social commentary that portrays an America torn
apart
by violence, class warfare, predjudice, and Hi-C.
there were some quite gory senses with throat-slitting, and strangulations,
apart
from that i found it to be a very good storyline.
Years go by of the couple living
apart
and the child grows up thinking her mother doesn't love and care for her.
I thought it also kind of totally fell
apart
in the last 1/3
Yes...both films were made within a year apart, but their objectives are completely different.
Apart
from the fact that the 'shock' of the fight wears off after a while, having a battle scene that takes up 75% of the film's run-time leaves no room for character development - and hence you could not give a monkeys who lives or who dies.
The cast is good, but without a director it all falls apart....
This is what sets him
apart
from other slashers such as Michael Myers and Jason Vorhees for they hid behind masks.
there wasn't much to go
apart
from the Lola (Lindsey Lohan) characters dream of being a starlet.
The plot is not worth repeating, you've seen it a million times, you know, a sheriff in a moral crisis- what sets this film
apart
is that it's over two hours long, and apparently no one had the wherewithal cut it to a watchable length.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Other
Their
There
Movie
About
Could
Would
People
Being
Really
Falling
After
Falls
Where
Years
World
Together
Story
Country