Answer
in sentence
4985 examples of Answer in a sentence
And how can we agree on any answer, given our different interests, dispositions, and cultural backgrounds?
A theist
answer
is equally unacceptable, given the monstrous crimes carried out by zealots convinced they were fulfilling their divine duty.
The best
answer
I have come across is German: Immanuel Kant’s, to be precise.
The only sound
answer
is: because there is no truly rational alternative.
Most experts believe that the
answer
to the last question is no – at least not in the same form.
More important, do we need to
answer
that question definitively in order to boost the pace of economic recovery?
Yet NATO states have no
answer
to the question that logically follows: What would a political solution entail?
To
answer
that question, several variables must be taken into account: demand growth, technological change, investment, and the commitment to confront global warming, among others.
Most people would easily and quickly
answer
“no.”
Firm commitments at Riga of more allied troops and equipment for the ISAF and fewer national “caveats” must be part of the
answer.
That is not an easy question to
answer.
Rightly so: economists have plenty to
answer
for.
If your
answer
does not use elements from behavioral economics, agency theory, information economics, and international economics, among others, it is likely to remain seriously incomplete.
The answer, it turns out, is to help them do what they are already doing on their own.
One
answer
is that European governments are large shareholders in the Fund.
The
answer
lies in this fact: increased competition and improving productivity reduce the inflationary pressures that arose during previous economic expansions.
America’s
answer
is that it is better to work than to be marginalized through welfare or unemployment.
So, when Western leaders ask Arabs and others in the region why they can’t govern themselves, they should be prepared for the answer: “For a full century, your interventions have undermined democratic institutions (by rejecting the results of the ballot box in Algeria, Palestine, Egypt, and elsewhere); stoked repeated and now chronic wars; armed the most violent jihadists for your cynical bidding; and created a killing field that today stretches from Bamako to Kabul.”
The
answer
is not less Europe, more Europe, or no Europe; it is a different Europe.
The only
answer
is precisely the opportunity to reap the benefits of integration.
The
answer
is yes – but for the worse.
Over the last 15 years, the eurozone’s economic performance has been disappointing, and its policy system must
answer
for this.
This would not be seen as 'second class' membership, but rather as the right 'Agenda 2000', the proper
answer
to the hopes of a genuinely reunited Europe that were reborn in 1989.
There is only one answer: the losers, in this crisis, can only be the member states; either directly; or indirectly, through the weakening of the independence of “their” national Commissioners.
The
answer
is, No; provided Romano Prodi can bring to his European task a political project which is sufficiently inspiring and sufficiently realistic.
Many people started to think of regional integration as the
answer
to depression.
The answer, of course, is that life is more complicated than the contrasting positions of globalization as panacea or curse.
To answer, one needs to understand the composition of the Iranian electorate.
The
answer
is clear: not many more.
We shall soon know the
answer.
Back
Next
Related words
Question
Would
Which
Questions
There
Could
About
Their
People
Think
Should
Asked
Where
Other
Simple
Going
Might
World
Right
First
