Agreements
in sentence
1458 examples of Agreements in a sentence
But its obligation is to render a dispassionate reading of legal agreements, and it is renowned for doing so, which is one reason why it is the country’s most trusted institution.
To deploy this technology, which is based on American research but piloted in-country, Zipline signed
agreements
with the aviation authority and the ministry of health, among others, and a public-private partnership was set up to fund the program.
So far, the US and Russia have not only broken off bilateral negotiations; mutual nuclear
agreements
have also come under threat.
By focusing on the need to reach
agreements
on borders within a short time period, Palestinians are saying that they do not see any need to negotiate gradual steps, preferring to agree on the final settlement first and then work back on issues of implementation.
Since 1992, it has negotiated
agreements
on regional communications and transport, tariffs, free trade and industrial zones, and joint border markets.
North Korea unilaterally repudiated all of its obligations under
agreements
reached with five negotiating parties.
If the UK remains in the existing EU customs union – as is foreseen for the transition period – rather than negotiating a new customs agreement with the EU, that gentleman’s agreement would also extend to new trade
agreements
that the EU concludes with third countries.
After all, such
agreements
would apply explicitly to the EU’s entire customs territory – a term with a precise meaning under WTO rules.
As a gesture of goodwill, the EU should also support the UK’s efforts to “grandfather” its market access resulting from existing EU free-trade
agreements
and thereby avoid the need to renegotiate each and every deal.
The legal argument would be that the EU customs territory has not changed, so existing EU trade
agreements
must continue to apply to the UK.
Such a constructive approach would include steps – like supporting the grandfathering of trade
agreements
– that minimize friction during the transition period.
The case for tearing up free-trade
agreements
and aborting negotiations for new ones is premised on the belief that globalization is the reason for rising income inequality, which has left the American working class economically marooned.
That distrust could derail new trade
agreements
currently in the works, and prevent future ones from being initiated.
Second, countries should come together to update the international rules governing trade to account for changing economic conditions, and effectively implement negotiated
agreements.
These discussions, which are being led by the United Nations, will not result in legally binding
agreements.
If G-20 leaders can reach specific and effective
agreements
on exchange rates and global imbalances without overshadowing other issues, the prospects for a soft-landing for the global economy will improve greatly.
Instead, the PBOC is employing unconventional regulatory tools – such as short-term liquidity operations, standing lending facilities, and reverse repurchase
agreements
– to boost the money supply, driving the repurchase rate to a ten-year low.
All ten members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are at the table, along with Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Japan, and India, which have free-trade
agreements
with ASEAN.
They acknowledge that the European Union matters for trade
agreements
and currency issues, but consider it too irresolute to be a real player in today’s global power game, and too divided to cope with security and migration challenges.
For China, it seems, international
agreements
stop being binding when they are no longer politically convenient.
The anti-globalization protests in Seattle in 1999, at what was supposed to be the inauguration of a new round of trade talks, called attention to the failures of globalization and the international institutions and
agreements
that govern it.
For example, Iran has not yet ratified international economic
agreements
such as the Economic Cooperation Organization Trade Agreement (ECOTA), which would strengthen its economic ties with its neighbors, all of which are Muslim countries.
Obama’s effort to finalize both
agreements
before the end of his presidency, though understandable, bred serious concerns about hastiness.
But a year of talks and failed
agreements
has demonstrated that there is no purely diplomatic solution either.
Of course, even in the face of this misery, we should not lose hope in
agreements
reached by diplomatic means; but, realistically, the chances are dwindling every day.
This does not mean that collective bargaining
agreements
do not take into account inflation, but only that at a micro level a little inflation permits more "flexibility" in relative real wages.
Trade
agreements
like the TPP and TTIP address it only obliquely.
They reaffirmed their deference for each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and reached
agreements
on major strategic issues, including efforts to strengthen cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region and in multilateral institutions, and to respond jointly to regional and global challenges to peace and stability, for example, on the Korean Peninsula.
The Brexit vote in the UK and bipartisan opposition to trade
agreements
in the US are clear signs of this.
STANFORD – US President Donald Trump’s transactional approach to multinational
agreements
is very different from that of his predecessors.
Back
Next
Related words
Trade
Countries
International
Which
Would
Bilateral
Free-trade
Global
Their
Other
Should
Between
Signed
Could
Regional
Economic
Including
Multilateral
While
Investment