Example collocations logo

Agreements in sentence

1458 examples of Agreements in a sentence

It’s not just that today’s trade agreements extend to many other policy areas, such as health and safety regulations, patents and copyrights, capital-account regulations, and investor rights.
They have no need for trade agreements, because free trade is in their best interest to begin with (and they have no bargaining leverage over larger countries).
Economists see a case for trade agreements for large countries because these countries can manipulate their terms of trade – the world prices of the goods they export and import.
But it is difficult to square this rationale with what happens under actual trade agreements.
So economics doesn’t take us too far in understanding trade agreements.
Trade agreements, their proponents often argue, can help rein in such wasteful policies by making it harder for governments to dispense special favors to politically connected industries.
When trade agreements were largely about import tariffs, negotiated exchange of market access generally produced lower import barriers – an example of the benefits of lobbies acting as counterweights to one another.
Newer trade agreements incorporate rules on “intellectual property,” capital flows, and investment protections that are mainly designed to generate and preserve profits for financial institutions and multinational enterprises at the expense of other legitimate policy goals.
International trade agreements can contribute only in limited ways to remedying such domestic political failures, and sometimes they aggravate those failures.
Let us keep this in mind as we bemoan the passing of the era of trade agreements.
If we manage our own economies well, new trade agreements will be largely redundant.
These policies are popular with voters, and they are protected by powerful actors (for example, the strong export-oriented business sector) and by trade agreements with almost all the world’s major economies and regional blocs.
Worse, the freedom to join military treaties, stipulated in the Helsinki Accords of 1975 and in other major international agreements like the Charter of Paris for a New Europe or the Charter for European Security, is ominously omitted.
But policy documents and bilateral agreements are just two components of China’s new “going out” strategy.
So if governments want existing agreements to rule the waves, they must start acting on the sobering science and real-world numbers.
Where fisheries agreements are not succeeding, conservation agreements must be tried and applied.
At their last conference, held in Quito, Ecuador, in 2014, the CMS parties added several shark species, the protection of which governments are encouraged to secure through the negotiation of international agreements.
But in the longer term, with deficits looming, international trade agreements torn up, and totally inadequate spending on vital infrastructure, education, and health care, things could turn out very badly.
First, the Peruvian government focused on creating rights for the poor people whom the guerrillas controlled, and it codified those rights in its 1991 agreements with the United States and the United Nations.
In the end, Trump will need House Democrats for money, sanctions, or approval of trade agreements.
Its latest strategic plan calls for a self-sufficiency ratio of 45% by 2015 and focuses instead on “securing the stability of food imports” through diversification and free-trade agreements.
And while my most recent discussions suggest that agreements are likely to be reached at both of these meetings, it is far from certain that they will match the scale of the problem.
Crucially, the agreements must have teeth.
While the EU has at least some means - like preferential trade agreements and associations - to export something of its own stability to neighboring countries, NATO as a security alliance has no such means.
Decades of research demonstrate that a variety of overlapping policies at city, subnational, national, and international levels is more likely to succeed than are single, overarching binding agreements.
Agreements about how to make things better already frequently include NGOs and corporations in various capacities – and sometimes exclude governments altogether.
While enforcement in the coercive sense remains the domain of states, coercive enforcement is rare even when it comes to inter-governmental agreements.
Whether countries abide by agreements has far more to do with international processes of persuasion, socialization, and capacity-building – and those can be done by anyone with a good argument.
So, unlike many past international agreements, this one is dynamic, not static.
These measures included reduced public spending and the privatization of public goods, lower taxes, financial deregulation, and free-trade agreements.
BackNext