Example collocations logo

Actors in sentence

8175 examples of Actors in a sentence

The Worst acting ever.These actors deserve the Academy Award for the worst, and I mean worst acting roles in the history of the cinema.
It has no believable plot, some of the key actors were a joke (NOT Lars Bom, he is cool!).
It is unbelievable how such a cast of established actors could have been in such an amateurish, pointless, non-movie.
technically, this movie would have had it all: decent actors, a nice landscape, no obvious sights of a lack of budget, a celebrity like richard attenborough.
The acting itself was OK from all the actors, but...I wasn't satisfied.
While this is very odd (especially the idea of a club of private citizens who solve crimes) and COULD have been interesting, this film falls apart despite a rather impressive list of familiar supporting actors.
I thought because it had good actors in it like Gabrielle Union, Hill Harper, and of course the infamous Billy D. Williams.
Employing non-Chinese actors to play Chinese roles is understandable, but to write dialogue for them that's TOTALLY OFF is dumb!
These actors are laughable throughout the entire film, not convincing at all.
I could be wrong... no I'm not wrong, this movie is not enjoyable on any level.The jail montage looked like it was a summer camp, just instead of kids, it was a sausage fest of horrible actors, just hanging out and laughing and trying to look hard.
Not at the acting was bad, in fact, a few actors were actually fairly decent.
The story is: a turn-of-the-century troupe of actors, along with producers and theatre-owners, have very complicated relationships.
Nice effort from the actors, but a poorly conceived production.
Linda Hamilton is great as always and the other actors are above average considering there seems to be a complete lack of direction.
The actors are ALL terrible.
And then one of the most irritating child actors onscreen(ernie reyes)as Prince Tarn who should have been slapped hard and sent to bed.What a little irritating scut.
None of the action scenes are exciting the story line is nothing special and except for a couple of actors the acting is bad.
The actors go around and act very showy.
Except for Law (and even he is guilty of some showy acting), all the actors here are near amateurish.
The acting was flat (at least none of the actors sounded like they'd just got the script that morning) and the film and sound quality made me think of the 70s movie of the week bombs.
A four-and-a-half-hour O'Neill play gets boiled down to a little under two, and much of that running time is devoted to actors with frozen expressions on their faces as they read their characters' thoughts in voice-over.
Robert Leonard's direction is stodgy and he shows little facility for reining in hyperactive actors.
However, the actors were not convincing enough to pull this off.
Just more bad actors pathetically attempting to make a movie so they can get enough money to eat.
The story is highly predictable, most of the actors very uninspired, or just plainly miscast, special effects of very low quality.
As if it isn't awful enough to see "product placement" actors like Bruce Willis who smoke in their movies - at least children movies should be more considerate!
One of my favorite "bum" actors, C. Tom Howell, stars in this tepid remake of WOTW.
The good actors (Jackson, Ed Harris, Eva Mendes) play in an suspenseful story with some twists --- but only up to the last 25 minutes.
There are several instances of actors pausing while trying to remember their lines, actors walking in front of actors who are talking, and one point where the film skips about seven frames.
Though on a more positive note, the actors did a great job in acting in their roles.
BackNext