Example collocations logo

Actors in sentence

8175 examples of Actors in a sentence

Actors are so average especially Deniz Akkaya is pretty annoying with the teacher role.
The story and dialogue are rushed beyond comprehension, with the voice actors sounding like they phoned in their lines.
Stunning natural locations (yes, these remote parts of Southern Italy look exotic even to most other Italians), pretty actors and some amusing, gutsy, spontaneous performances by a handful of attractive children won't elevate a substanceless movie beyond a pretty succession of images.
So, production began and very small bits and pieces on the shoot and the actors involved were released until the shoot wrapped.
The only positive thing I can say for this movie is that with a new script and the right director and actors it could be a great story.
Secondly I don't think any part of the movie, apart from two shots from Copenhagen where none of the actors were in, were actually taped in Denmark.
I really hope this is all just a bad joke and these people don't actually expect people to watch this with a straight face, and I really hope the people who were in this movie were doing terrible acting on purpose and don't actually believe that they are good actors?!
So all in all this film is not worth viewing for anyone not interested in mocking a filmmaker and his actors decisions for an hour and a half.
"Undercurrent" features a top-notch cast of wonderful actors who might've been assembled for the perfect drawing-room comedy.
Mainly, it is said rather early on that the killer (Jack O'Halloran, whom is one of the few slightly known actors) only kills women.
Figured I'd check it out because it looked like a good stoner comedy with a lot of fairly well-known actors.
I could not believe what i saw...(once) brilliant actors appearing in this dire effort that should never of been made.
On stage the action froze while the actors spoke their thoughts to the audience.
You'd think that would work better but since the action no longer freezes the actors are forced to pause speaking and grimace at the camera to match the emotions in their thoughts.
The split screens don't allow you to get very involved in the emotions of the actors.
Even-though the production value was good, the ill written story just compounded on top of the bad performance of the actors, and there is even a half-hearted attempts to a twist to the ending of the movie, which ends up quite confusing.
didn't have any compulsion whatsoever in presenting the different heterosexual couples in the most passionate embraces including nudity and super close-ups of French kissing and all sorts of nude contortions in bed, completely unnecessary in their length and in the story, when the moment came to show the same experiences with the homosexual couple, they only dare to go as far as an excruciatingly painful hug, almost among scholarly giggles, with two very nervous actors.
if this movie would have had better cinematics, and a lot better actors, i might of had something better to say.
However when I saw that the movie had Fred Williamson and Robert Forster (both great actors), I just had to watch the film.
I figure they spent a maximum of a few hundred thousand dollars American to hire the actors, rent the rest stop locale and burn a truck and drag a motorcycle along behind the truck for a bit plus pay for the technical stuff.
Then, the voice in off seems as a documentary, actors and actress in the movie sometimes laughs -take a look to the sequence when Juana arrives to the council which want to keep her isolated-; the castles are almost broken when in the age of the movie they have been recently built, crowds are just "four" people, lights are bad placed...Compared with Amelie Poulain, the french movie for the oscars...it has no sense to speak about a bad movie like Juana la loca.
A laughably bad story, surpassed only by the horrible screenplay, Cat6DD, as I like to call it, inspires more sympathy for the actors involved than terror in nature that the movie was supposed to bring out.
It didn't matter what the story was, the acting was terrible, the words the actors said were dumb, and 13 scientists throughout the country had coronaries after hearing the dribble that came out of the movie.
Action let's just admit that it has some but the scenes are poorly filmed, the actors are pathetic.
None of the actors did a good job in it's own role.
The actors are way overacting, the special effects are ridiculous and there is not any plot that makes any sense.
To have a show that centers on the topic of politics, you really need a strong plot with twists and turns to enhance the mood of the show, something like "The West Wing" or "Commander-in-Chief." Rob Lowe was OK, but actors like Kyle Chandler just couldn't act (he was awful in "Early Edition").
Bussey jr was trying so hard to portray the image of his father(one of the best bad guy actors ever) that failed miserably the only redeeming qualities in the movie was the chicks,,,,,good looking and with lots of T&A just not worth the time or your hard earned dollar to rent it
It stars the excellent Donald Sutherland among several capable actors.
This movie is proof as to why NBC has always been a 3rd rate network The producers, actors, and writers should get on their knees and beg God's forgiveness for making this work of fiction.
BackNext