Acting
in sentence
11391 examples of Acting in a sentence
The best
acting
performance in the whole thing was Snoop Dogg, who has one line in a 10 second scene.
As for Val if he keeps selecting films like this he may as well kiss goodbye to his
acting
career.
The hammy
acting
of lead Richard Dix, nominated for best actor, can be excused as a relic of the silent-film school of
acting.
The
acting
is horrible, and the directing is horrendous.
The
acting
for the most part really wasn't that bad, but the story was just pointless with flaws and boring.
I remember Cole Hauser in "Tigerland", and although his
acting
is wooden, he does portray a tough "leader" character.
The two sidekicks, who are supposed to be geniuses are
acting
like two 16 year old frat boys.
The writing was awful, the
acting
was awful, the subject was awful.
If you enjoy bad acting, people running through small portions of caves, bouncing cameras posed at bad angles, and people screaming while the screen is in complete darkness, you'll love this movie.
The
acting
is just awful, the choice of music is, mildly putting it, peculiar, there arent enough fighting scenes, the plot is non-existent and whatever small entertainment one could get from this film is ruined by the annoying way some of the movie is filmed and gives you a splitting headace.
The
acting
was atrocious even for B Grade standards.
But the atrocious acting, amateurish cinematography and terrible dubbing make this film achingly bad.
My guess is that the producers filmed mostly in Russia, choosing women for their looks -- and willingness to work cheap -- rather than
acting
ability.
The bones of a good movie are here, and the directing from Shatner is not as bad as is commonly made out, but the characters end up speaking and
acting
way out of the style that the previous 3 films had carefully established.
With horrible acting, a painfully generic "plot" and no dimensional characters, no matter how bored and drunk you are, this one is not worth your 81 minutes.
Add in a bunch of bad British
acting
and it's pretty much OVER.
It was not very good in its
acting
or story plot, but can be a great movie quiz question from an historical standpoint.
The
acting
was so good as I began this time, I thought, "Great!
No great suspense.. no great direction... nothing phenomenal with the acting... shy away from this... low rating... Nothing to write about this movie so I am filling up the remaining lines of text so you can imagine how much a time waster this movie is...really irritated at how good a premise that was and how bad a screenplay was written out of it...
The
acting
atrocious.
His semi-erection in a few scenes is the only indication that he might be acting; mostly it looks like something he did to buy drugs.
If you're looking for a movie that's fun to watch simply because you can make jokes about the not so great acting, cheesy "special" effects, and typical sci-fi plot...then this is the movie for you!
Not at the
acting
was bad, in fact, a few actors were actually fairly decent.
Comanche Moon met that expectation with its marginal directing and acting, poor casting and frankly, a lousy script.
At least the level of
acting
is high.
A story that could have been interesting is completely wasted by incredibly bad
acting
and horrible editing/directing.
I picked it up because I kind of like Buscemi
acting
humor.
The
acting
and camera work and editing was fine.
Corny and some really bad
acting
but for a Golan-Globus film about right on par.
I had no problem with the low-production values and the
acting
wasn't great, but this is telly, so it was fine.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Story
Great
There
Script
Really
About
Effects
Terrible
Would
Characters
Actors
Which
Could
Their
Direction
Horrible
Writing
Special
Other