Example collocations logo

Acting in sentence

11391 examples of Acting in a sentence

The acting was so awful, I felt like I was watching a bunch of kids in the neighborhood putting on a play.
I noticed that another adaptation is being filmed for 2005 so we can only hope the acting will be better!
The attempts at comedy are lame, the compulsory girl-on-girl scene is sickening, the plot is nonexistent, the acting is among the worst I've ever seen, and don't even get me started on special effects.
The locales change but the plots remain the same, and with the same shallow character development and the equally shallow acting as trained performers are asked to devolve into pseudo-cartoon characters and act accordingly.
Actually the script "may" have worked if the lead roles had been cast with younger actors, but the dramatics of an aging Diane Lane acting as if she was a teenager (or even a twenty-something) was too much to stomach.
The script, although filled with some quotable lines, doesn't quite capture the feel of that time period and, coupled with some bad acting, seems rather contemporary.
Then I sat through some really bad acting and then some guy was suckered into walking into an underground research laboratory where he got eaten by a ferocious T-Rex.
The acting makes Arnie look like a RSC thespian.
Why they felt the need to make the movie is beyond me, but they should have known it could not match the acting of the first movie when they only could get Ruth Gordon back to reprise her role.
From the non-existent acting to the atrocious singing, I was cringing at least once per minute.
But to see the lack of acting skills shown, the seemingly drug-induced dancing, and then, horrors of horrors, to hear the singing of Pierce Brosnan(!),
The plot in this movie is very thin, and there is not much acting.
An abysmal attempt to explain every single mystery of Pinhead and the puzzle box, covering literally centuries of history, in a film that runs UNDER 90 minutes... On display is sub-par to wretched acting, sup-par to wretched B-movie special effects, and a ludicrous and insulting attempt at dark humour, while STILL attempting to keep the whole project completely serious.
Music, acting, lighting, sets, "special" effects... about the only positives I can find are that Sue looks cute in her blue tights and that the Thing make-up is almost passable (face only).
were probably achieved spending a couple of grand, the acting is terrible and the script should have ended up in the trash bin after the first read by the studio that decided to take on this miserable project.
Here you will find writing and acting bad enough to rival anything Ed Wood ever produced.
When it comes the acting, put it this way, I went to a play with my 6 year old niece in it and she gave an Oscar worthy performance, when compared to these D-List (and that's being kind about it) actors and actresses.
It's a hodge-podge of grainy stock footage spliced together with some of the all-time worst acting you'll ever have the misfortune to see.
Despite the good acting efforts by the actors, it suffered from a general lack of funding from Paramount Pictures.
The Worst acting ever.These actors deserve the Academy Award for the worst, and I mean worst acting roles in the history of the cinema.
I thought the acting was really bad.
One thing is that it's just boring and acting isn't very good but much better than "DGITW" and this movie actually has some attractive looking females to look at, all three of the female leads were stunning.
terrible acting, terrible script.
This might not have been as horribly bad as it was if not for the absolutely awful acting job done by Raymond Wallace!
The acting overall was even and the characters endearing enough that you regretted they died off like recently sprayed roaches, scattering off to die their own gruesome deaths.
The acting is just so awful it sounds like an instruction video for social studies class.
The characters were shallow, the dialog stilted, the acting bad, and yes that includes Seymour.
The acting itself was OK from all the actors, but...I wasn't satisfied.
For a Seagal movie it has very little (almost no) action but he does put in some reasonable (for him) acting in contrived character development scenes.
The acting performances are irredeemably awful and headache inducing.
BackNext