Example collocations logo

Abysmal in sentence

211 examples of Abysmal in a sentence

I think the key to this failure is the abysmal writing and directing from Scott Spiegel.
avoid at all costs....I am not a big fan of movies that re-enact real life events...I thought Munich was an absolute piece of garbage movie...this one is right up there...maybe they could have filmed the cast being taken out back and beaten once the film was over for such an abysmal performance.... Now I upset myself...toss this one on the fire, along with House of Sand and Fog...and quite frankly, even if I were a journalist with heroic delusions, I would definitely stay out of a hellhole country like this couple was in....Angelina has done nothing to ever recommend her as a good actress...without her looks she would be nowhere, like this movie...
Just abysmal.
Its a sad day in Hollywood when important media events are exploited as soul vehicles for Academy Award Nominations...It is very sad to see the most conspicious consumers in Hollywood pretend to have a heart to place a Golden Statue on their Mantles in the name of Art and Intellectualism...Film is the avenue to the consciousness of the world we live in...My Hope is that people run out of the theatre and cringe in dismay at the abysmal performances of a technological facsimily of Acting this film gives its audience...Hollywood should be disturbed at what is considered good Acting among its elite and rein in the obvious exploitation of story, plot and heart...This is truly a disappointing and non-academy award winning film.....................
laser scenes and miniature bombs, the acting is abysmal, an in my mind there wss no need for gratuitous sex scene half way through, i mean would u like to see a pizza face 50 year old man having sex with a woman half his age (who repaetedly changes her clothes in the back of a van without a van). it appears that the 50 year old star's grandad acted out the fight scenes due to the slow pace and all round crapness of it.
There was no action, the acting, writing, and directing were abysmal, and it wasn't even decently filmed.
Special effects are poor, the "Bibleman" character is a hypocritical creep, acting is abysmal, dialog is inane, plots are painful to follow, and the only lessons being taught here are how NOT to make children's entertainment.
This wasn't as bad as "Flesh for Frankenstein," which was so abysmal I couldn't bring myself to comment on it, but it's a bad, bad, terrible, horrendous movie.
The special effects abysmal.
I don't know where to begin with this abysmal blunder, first off though (and most obvious) Nicole DuPont CANNOT ACT.
It really is abysmal when you get morons making a sequel (and heaven forbid a third instalment, this time the actor playing Edvard has gone and is played by someone else again) which they proceed to ruin completely.
The songs -lyrics and music are abysmal and most of the actors can barely carry a tune.
I have a feeling that strict horror fans are the ones writing positive reviews of the Masters of Horror episodes, as they have been mostly abysmal thus far.
twist.....this movie is just abysmal!
To date, the only other films I've seen by Luigi Batzella are "Devil's Wedding Night" (abysmal) and "Beast In Heat" (SUPER abysmal).
This is a truly abysmal low-budget horror flick, put together by a bunch of amateurs that know nothing about cinema but simply wanted to cash-in on the success of such contemporary classics like "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre".
The script was good, a lot of the photography was good, but the lighting was abysmal.
The acting isn't just bad, it's abysmal.
Plot aside, the acting was abysmal, but better than some movies I've seen in the past (some actors were worse than others).
But overall this movie was abysmal, and was just one step below "Private Resort", simply because Private Resort had Johnny Depp (who went on to do great things), I'm afraid this cant be said for this movie.
Absolutely abysmal production proves that Lustig can use a camera, but Cohen can't write worth a darn.
The atmosphere is dull and boring and the acting aside from Geoffrey's is abysmal.
The script is one abysmal cliché after another and the direction and editing are horrible, too.
It's got the stock characters of the bullied nerd and the cruel gang of'punks' that pick on him and an abysmal storyline about a horoscope phone line that kills people; and that the recorded message talks directly to the characters doesn't phase them at all.I had the misfortune to sit through this some time ago so cant remember too much about it, but I suppose that's my point.
All of the actors were just abysmal.
This film is atrocious, even by the abysmal standards of Tony Zarindast.
Richard Chamberlain and Sharon Stone are reunited for this abysmal follow-up, which somehow contrives to be even worse than the already-awful original.
I don't understand how the reviews on this are all good and rating the abysmal film between 8-10 stars... what a joke!
At such a distance it is easy to forget the impact that Naschy's presence as either Daninsky or his werewolf alter-ego made on the movie-going public when it first appeared (proving obviously popular enough to generate the myriad sequels, or variations on the same theme, which followed) for, even if the monster gets a fair work-out here (scenes from this film were actually lifted outright for the abysmal THE FURY OF THE WOLFMAN [1970]!), he's also chained up for a good part of the second half, as if Naschy was as yet unsure how to use his 'creation'.
This film is abysmal.
Back