Zero
in sentence
1619 examples of Zero in a sentence
For example, our research has found that a woman with
zero
years of schooling will have, on average, 4-5 more children than a woman with at least 12 years of schooling.
While one can debate the appropriateness of tightening accounting standards in the middle of a crisis, his order that banks increase their capital is entirely justified, especially at a time when the European Central Bank is subsidizing them with a wall of three-year liquidity at almost
zero
cost.
But as I also pointed out back then, just because the long-term value of Bitcoin is more likely to be $100 than $100,000 does not necessarily mean that it definitely should be worth
zero.
So, while we shouldn’t be surprised by this year’s cryptocurrency price bust, the price of these coins is not necessarily
zero.
Dragging their feet, the incompetent people at the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank have finally gotten interest rates down to
zero.
The Federal funds rate in the US is practically zero, and the European Central Bank’s main refinancing rate, already at an all-time low of 2%, will likely fall further in the coming months.
Moreover, even if prices on average exhibit some downward flexibility, deflation necessarily increases the real rate of interest, given that nominal interest rates cannot fall below
zero.
This would be a particular problem for the US, where the Fed allowed the Federal funds rate to approach
zero
in January 2009.
Ever since Japan’s banking crisis began in 1990, the country has been in a liquidity trap, with central bank rates close to zero, and from 1998 to 2005 the price level declined by more than 4%.
Today’s near-zero – even slightly negative – short-term policy interest rates do not mean that longer-term rates, which are more relevant to investment financing, have also hit
zero.
Education is increasingly online as well, and will soon enable students everywhere to receive first-rate instruction at almost a
zero
“marginal” cost for enrolling another student.
Although the
zero
nominal bound on interest rates – previously only a theoretical possibility – had been reached and zero-interest-rate policy (ZIRP) had been implemented, growth remained anemic.
There was quantitative easing (QE), or purchases of long-term government bonds, once short-term rates were already
zero.
Then there was “forward guidance” (FG), the commitment to keep policy rates at
zero
for longer than economic fundamentals justified, thereby further reducing shorter-term interest rates.
For example, committing to maintain
zero
policy rates for, say, three years implies that interest rates on securities with up to a three-year maturity should also fall to zero, given that medium-term interest rates are based on expectations concerning short-term rates over the next three years.
With banks unable to switch into cash (thereby earning
zero
rates), central banks could go even more negative with policy rates.
Governments managed to limit the damage by pumping huge amounts of money into the global economy and slashing interest rates to near
zero.
While this is better than
zero
at a German bank, the difference is too small to make a difference, given the real danger that Greece might have to leave the eurozone, which would render local deposits worthless.amp
But the true measure of US insolvency is evident from the adjustments needed to reduce the country’s fiscal gap to
zero.
But now that interest rates are at zero, Germany’s large savings are no longer doing it much good.
But if inflation in India is 5% and
zero
in the US, it will cost the Indian manufacturer 66.2 rupees to make it today – and still just a dollar for American competitors.
When the economy is in a liquidity trap – when demand is deficient, prices are stagnant or falling, and interest rates approach
zero
– normal macroeconomic logic goes out the window.
Investors are buying long-term bonds at the current low interest rates because the interest rate on short-term investments is now close to
zero.
The most popular culprit is the Fed, which has begun to taper its highly experimental policy of “quantitative easing,” or purchases of long-term assets aimed at supporting growth beyond what could be achieved with
zero
nominal interest rates.
In the euro zone and Japan, the outlook for 2009 and 2010 is even worse, with growth close to
zero
even next year.
But, in the last two years, the stock market has predicted six out of the last
zero
economic recoveries – that is, six bear market rallies that eventually fizzled and led to new lows.
When you hold a checking or current account in your bank at a
zero
interest rate – as most people do in advanced economies – the real return is negative (the nominal
zero
return minus inflation): a year from now, your cash balances buy you less goods than they do today.
Since August 1, the price of a US dollar has added an extra zero, and inflation has exceeded 50% per month since September.
Slow growth, combined with large fiscal deficits and near
zero
inflation, has driven government debt from 50% of GDP to 236% of GDP.
But five years of
zero
interest rates and massive quantitative easing have failed to achieve this.
Back
Next
Related words
Interest
Rates
Would
Policy
There
Which
Growth
Could
About
Central
Close
Their
Below
Movie
Banks
Inflation
Negative
Years
Emissions
Lower