Year
in sentence
18136 examples of Year in a sentence
But when he lets things get really outrageous (the drug sequence is the second funniest moment I've had all
year
in movies, the first also coming in a lame movie: Andrea Martin in ALL OVER THE GUY complaining about the movie IN & OUT), it's just plain funny.
The depth of the movie is definitely its strong point and the twists and turns it implements, keeping the audience at the edge of their seats really drives the creepy...ninja... puberty-stricken... pre-thirty
year
old student...non-cowboy drawing...wise-cracking...son-of-a-bitch scarecrow into the limelight as the creepiest horror icon of the
year.
This movie is one of the worst ones of the
year.
The only thing I remember about this movie are two things: first, as a twelve
year
old, even I thought it stunk.
Just when I thought I would finish a whole
year
without giving a single movie a "Bomb" rating, a friend brought this notorious turd to my house last night.
As usual, something goes wrong: the on-site super-computer (named Seth - like the snake in "King Cobra" the same year) goes power-crazy, takes command of the Unisols, and even downloads its computer brain into a new super-Unisol body (Jai White).
Having read during many years about how great this film was, how it established Ruiz among the french critics (specially the snobbish Cahiers crowd), when I finally watched it about a
year
ago, I found it pretty disappointing (but then, I guess my expectations were sky-high).
Apart from the grim opening (which even a five
year
old would be able to predict the outcome of) the rest is drivel.
Even though Deanna Durbin was younger than the 21
year
old Hayley Mills while playing the doting daughter(s) roles, Durbin looks much older, as in adult.
On the 26th of September 1983 a short dumpy 60
year
old woman stood trial for the attempted murder of Leonie Haddad, a lady whose husband had recently died and had agreed to take in a lodger who came via a housing authority for the elderly.
Made one
year
after the best movie of Fred Olen Ray's career, "Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers", this one can't help but feel like a bit of a letdown.
The story could have been better written by my 3
year
old twin cousins (who are Scooby Doo fans too).
Some are not funny outright, but some are amusing -- in a 12
year
old boy kind of way.
I cannot believe a parent would allow a, let's say, 4
year
old child to watch this.
In 2005,George W. Bush started with his second period as a President of the United States; North Korea announced its possession of nuclear weapons; Pope John Paul II died after a long illness; and a movie called Into the Blue appeared.The existence of this movie is not as bad as the other things that happened on that year,but the film itself was pathetic and maybe,the worst one from that year.Now,in 2009,the United States have another President,there is another Pope,new Korean nuclear weapons...and the film Into the Blue 2 : The Reef,which is better than the original one...but that's the same as saying : "getting your fingers cut is better than getting your head cut".This sequel is a really bad film which kept me tremendously bored and uninterested.The cast of Into the Blue 2 : The Reef is composed by TV-series actors who completely lack of any credibility and dramatic weight,but who are perfect for showing their bodies.Chris Carmack (The O.C.),David Anders (Heroes and Alias),Laura Vandervoort (Smallville),Marsha Tomason (Lost) and Audrina Patridge (The Hills) bring hollow and boring performances.I have liked some previous movies from director Stephen Herek (Critters and Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure specially) but on this movie,he cannot generate even the minimum level of tension,emotion or entertainment.The characters from this movie are not only badly performed,but they are also repulsive.Honestly,I wanted all of them to die.The cinematography from this movie is also lame and it seems to have been made by a technical team who makes promotional videos for Hawaiian hotels.Into the Blue 2 : The Reef is a horrible movie which is better than the original film,but that's the same as nothing,as I previously said.Avoid this crappy film at all costs.
A
year
later she's out, has a new boyfriend named Hank (Joseph Lawrence) and is about to spend Spring Break with Hank and four other mindless friends in a BIG, beautiful condo in Florida.
As an impressionable 10
year
old, I liked the "love conquers all" philosophy of the 70s sitcom "Bridget Loves Bernie."
Besides that, John Hurt was a terrible casting choice, looking about 15 years older than the 39
year
old Winston he was supposed to be portraying.
It seems to me, that the movie has actually been written by a 14
year
old boy, who thinks that drinking is cool, women are designed to please men and all that oppose that view are geeks.
This movie is another fine example of what Jerry Bruckheimer, since about 1997, seems to be best at--hyping up a movie a
year
before its release and not coming through with a quality movie.
Usually you only see that kind of hair on a ten
year
old boy and the character acted like it.
I was sorely disappointed not only in the acting credentials but in the silly story line that reads from a five
year
old's comic book.
My 5
year
old likes it - but thinks it's a bit boring.
As has been pointed out, she is too old to play an 18
year
old and looks far too young as a grandmother with a college age granddaughter? Lee Remick is good although she also is ageless in her later years.
The main problem lies with the character of Gregory himself, in that there is no sign of the endearing and charming sixteen
year
old Gregory who actively and comically pursues Dorothy convinced that he would eventually win her over.
Unfortunately on a thirty five
year
old it just comes across as odd and vaguely creepy.
Most five
year
olds would be able to come up with more realistic dialogue and a more plausible plot.
The fourth "Tremors" feature goes back in time, to the
year
1889.
If there is one film which is the worst of this year- it's TASHAN The first promo gave an indication that the film will be a boring Dhoom 2 style film, and well i knew first only it would be a bad film whatever it maybe Because of it being a Yashraj film Or maybe seeing the cheesy promo But this film gave me a shock, it was even worst then Dhoom 2 and what i expected First Saif's introduction which is boring Then Saif- Kareena meet, Kareena is so artificial and then Anil Kapoor oh god, what he is doing in such a weird film?
This was Chaplin's tenth comedy for Keystone during his
year
of apprenticeship, and his first two-reeler.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
About
Would
Billion
Million
After
People
Their
First
Years
Could
Growth
There
World
Countries
Since
Movie
Global
Economy
Government