Winners
in sentence
441 examples of Winners in a sentence
There are no real
winners
amid this confusion and confrontation, though of course some are doing better than others.
How is it possible, I asked, that almost all of them had instinctively favored free trade, which entails a similar – in fact, most likely greater – redistribution from losers to
winners?
There will be
winners
and losers, of course, but systematic sectoral out-performance looks unlikely.
Even in technology start-ups, older people are surprise
winners.
Similarly, old-fashioned dirigisme – such as attempts to “pick winners,” foster national “champions,” or keep failed business models alive through state subsidies – is both harmful and doomed to fail.
The AKP’s support came from both the
winners
and losers of globalization, from conservative middle Anatolia and cosmopolitan Istanbul, from the nationalist Black Sea region and the predominantly Kurdish Southeast.
Some of the obvious political
winners
from Brexit are people who do not like Western Europe and what it stands for.
The US conceived of itself as the Cold War's winner, and winners, it seems, make the rules.
Europe – and, within it, Germany – were among the big
winners
of November 9, 1989.
The real
winners
of this new world order are the large emerging countries, first and foremost China and India, which increasingly set the pace of global economic and political development.
Horizontal PDPs are relatively uncontroversial, but vertical PDPs can unleash severe criticism, with skeptics claiming that they involve “picking winners.”
In other words, when a government provides money to train a particular kind of engineer, lay out a particular road, or build a particular lab, it is favoring one sector over others, and hence de facto picking
winners.
Nonetheless, there is a creeping perception that the OSCE is becoming too deeply engaged in picking
winners
and losers in Albanian politics - a perception underpinned by wider questions of sovereignty.
Some argue that government is not good at picking
winners.
Even when all involved tried to rise above pettiness and partiality, selecting
winners
was always difficult– and remains so.
The cult of the Prize began even before the first
winners
were announced.
The creed of the Prize did not depend so much on the merit of the winners, as much as the understanding that the Prize was a powerful means to gain prestige, publicity, and advantage.
Free trade, technological progress, and other forces that promote economic “efficiency” are presented as beneficial to society, even if they harm individual workers or businesses, because growing national incomes allow
winners
to compensate losers, ensuring that nobody is left worse off.
Liberalizing policies are justified in theory only by the assumption that political decisions will redistribute some of the gains from
winners
to losers in socially acceptable ways.
By deregulating finance and trade, intensifying competition, and weakening unions, governments created the theoretical conditions that demanded redistribution from
winners
to losers.
Added to the
winners
in single-seat constituencies--half the total--this would ensure it a sturdy majority of 250 to 270 of the Duma's 450 seats.
We Need an International Environmental Criminal CourtNAIROBI – The announcement of the
winners
of this year’s Goldman Environmental Prize is an opportunity to celebrate activist leaders.
Performance enhancing drugs cheapen sport, making
winners
out of also-rans, and depriving virtuous and superior athletes of the victories that should be theirs.
The Rise of the BRICsPRINCETON -- The
winners
of the great globalization push of the 1990’s were small states such as New Zealand, Chile, Dubai, Finland, Ireland, the Baltic Republics, Slovenia, and Slovakia.
In today’s world, it looks as if the new
winners
are big states with large populations and rapid growth: Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRICs), in addition to the United States.
Competition means that a society has economic
winners
and losers, and everyone feels pressure to perform; flexibility means that the status quo is not written in stone.
The standard rap against industrial policy is that governments cannot pick
winners.
What determines success in industrial policy is not the ability to pick winners, but the capacity to let the losers go – a much less demanding requirement.
In the global race for nanotechnology leadership, the
winners
will be those who understand the risks and support the research necessary to minimize them.
Sure, trade has both losers and
winners.
Back
Related words
Losers
There
Their
Trade
Which
Globalization
Other
People
Would
Picking
Between
Economic
Clear
While
Economy
Political
World
Three
Should
Government