Example collocations logo

Winners in sentence

441 examples of Winners in a sentence

Many suspect that Islamist radicals will be the big winners in any democratic opening.
Even winners of competitive elections have commitments to their campaign teams and sponsors.
Here, there are winners and losers, because the majority can force through its preferences, even if the gains its members reap are dwarfed by the losses incurred by the minority.
In June, after the United States pressured Israel to allow Fulbright scholarship winners to leave the Gaza Strip, the Israeli military announced that it would grant exit permits for a few more students with “recognized” scholarships – but not “hundreds.”
But what if an election’s winners have no intention of abiding by the rules that are part and parcel of the democratic process?
The Rise of Shia PetrolistanNow that the dust of the Gulf War has settled over the Middle East, it is clear that some unexpected winners have emerged, blinking in the sunlight.
In January, during Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week, the UAE honored eight winners in five recipient categories with prizes totaling $4 million, rewarding proven innovators and giving them the financial support that they need.
As in so many other ways, things have turned out differently: the oil companies are the big winners, while the American and global economies are losers.
The big winners in relative terms were corporations and the rich, who benefited from dramatically reduced tax rates.
This requirement means that average corporate-tax revenue must remain the same, which implies that there will be winners and losers: some will pay less than they do now, and others will pay more.
Other corporate tax reforms might make sense; but they, too, imply winners and losers.
double down on having government pick winners and losers in green energy; expand spending on education and infrastructure; and substantially reduce defense expenditures.
If these are the winners, who are the losers?
The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETH) has the highest number of Nobel Prize winners of any institution in the world, no doubt partly due to the fact that 35% of its faculty is foreign.
In a global race, there are winners and losers.
In a “Digital China,” there will necessarily be winners and losers.
Another possibility, which can accompany the first one, is that Mexico’s rapid opening to imports has bifurcated its economy between a relatively small number of technologically advanced, globally competitive winners, and a growing segment of firms, particularly in services and retail trade, that serve as the residual source of employment.
He regards international relations as a zero-sum game of winners and losers, and, to the extent that his foreign and trade policies make any sense at all, they are transactional.
But there will also be winners, as new technologies create new business opportunities.
This is no coincidence: if allocated competitively, such a supra-national budget would identify winners and losers.
Gone are the confident assertions that globalization benefits everyone: we must, the elites now concede, accept that globalization produces both winners and losers.
“Only by enacting such policies will globalization’s losers begin to think that they may eventually join the ranks of its winners.”
Therefore, trade deals unambiguously enhance national wellbeing only to the extent that winners compensate losers.
Today’s consensus concerning the need to compensate globalization’s losers presumes that the winners are motivated by enlightened self-interest – that they believe buy-in from the losers is essential to maintain economic openness.
The world could continue to close its eyes to global warming and hope for the best: a slightly warmer climate that produces as many winners (on the Siberian, Northern European, and Canadian prairies) as losers (in already-hot regions that become hotter and dryer), and that the Gulf Stream continues warming Europe, the monsoons are not disrupted, and that the Ganges delta is not drowned by stronger typhoons.
But sound economics should also have told us that there were bound to be losers as well as winners, with the losers – and potential populist voters – often concentrated in the same smaller towns and rural areas that form the backbone of the gilets jaunes movement.
But none of us can deny the attraction of the flags under which those athletes compete, the anthem that is played for the winners, and, ultimately, that impossible-to-ignore, regularly-updated medal tally, listing the gold, silver, and bronze medals awarded to each country, the Games’ real honor roll.
Every Indian who follows the Olympics has cringed scanning the daily list of medal winners, eyes traveling down past dozens of nations big and small before alighting on a solitary Indian bronze in tennis or wrestling.
Just about the only thing we can say with some certainty is that there will be winners and losers.
And it is now clear that the biggest winners of globalization are no longer the Europeans or the Americans, but the Asians.
BackNext