Example collocations logo

Whose in sentence

6259 examples of Whose in a sentence

In terms of the shipping noise, the International Maritime Organization of the United Nations has formed a group whose job is to establish guidelines for quieting ships, to tell the industry how you could quiet ships.
I'd like to tell you about one such child, whose story was also covered by ABC News.
So if I could inspire even a fraction of you in the audience today to share this pioneering diagnostic approach with even one parent whose child is suffering from a developmental disorder, then perhaps one more puzzle in one more brain will be solved.
Do I show up with love for those whose ideas conflict with my own?
Depending on whose numbers you believe, it's between 60 and 85,000 people per day.
And what would you say to, for example, the, you know, the parent of someone whose son is out serving the U.S. military, and he says, "You know what, you've put up something that someone had an incentive to put out.
So you can't tell me that Sandra Bland is the only Black woman whose violence deserves more than our silence.
What about our other dark-skinned daughters in distress whose deaths we have yet to remember?
What about our children whose lives don't fit neatly between the lives of your genders?
J.B.S. Haldane himself had something to say about animals whose world is dominated by smell.
What they are is an addition of tadpoles that are named after a local bureaucrat whose decisions affect your water quality.
Do we care about those four billion people whose income levels are less than two dollars a day, the so-called bottom of the pyramid?
Because of the four billion people whose income is under two dollars a day.
It's not whose army wins; it's also whose story wins.
And we have to think much more in terms of narratives and whose narrative is going to be effective.
The dog's "best friend", an American girl named Charlotte (played by Courtnee Draper) whose parents die becomes orphaned by the former Duke due to him being her great uncle.
Lead Kevin Spacey, who also served as one of the film's producers, gives a controlled and focused performance as the power-mad mogul whose ego is out of control; he does good work, and yet the character doesn't ring true.
My friend, whose opinions I almost always trust about movies, especially horror movies, warned me NOT to rent this no matter how tempted or bored or desperate to see a new horror movie I was, because it was a complete waste of time.
This film is really an out and out comedy about a 40-yer-old porn star whose goal in life is to sing junky circuit party songs.
Even funnier is "manager" Kyle who appears to have the I.Q. of a turnip and whose collagen-injected lips look like a bee stung him.
Half of the movie was made up and it was more about the deputy whose mother was one of Ed Gein's victims.
What can you say about a movie whose funniest episode sees a fat man wrestling a garden hose?
Because these consequences are not spelled out, the movie leaves the viewer feeling sympathetic to Mr. Wilson (hey, check out his latest projects on the Internet) instead of seeing him as an individual whose actions were contrary to the best interests of his country and the West as a whole.
Matt Dillon plays Henry Chinaski, alter ego of author Charles Bukowski upon whose novel the film is based.
The Texas Revolution of 1835 to 1836, including the periods preceding and immediately following, is depicted in this mediocre 3-hour made-for-television film, whose only redeeming value is bringing light and paying homage to Stephen F. Austin, the so-called "Father of Texas" whose life story had long been overshadowed by that of the legendary Sam Houston.
He is a builder with a passion, but he has a partner whose profit motive includes over-insuring and burning.
But the man (Richard Thomas), whose psychiatric records reveal him as "stable" and "unimaginative", manages to escape from jail, beat it to the conspirator's beach house, and secretly record a conversation between them in which they reveal their guilt.
However as the film progresses what is shown is just a futile attempt at creating something meaningful as Arcand shows us half a dozen oddball,whimsical characters whose lives are intertwined with each other.Homosexuality and Lesbianism are not of any consequences here.
The directing by John Pieplow (whose only previous directing effort was Jurassic Women, which I will let the title speak for itself) was uninspired and there was something wrong with the editing which resulted in the film being disjointed with a few scenes completely unrelated to the plot, unless the screenplay is at fault (which is quite possible.)
This is an adaptation of an Edith Wharton work, whose writing is amazing.
BackNext