Weapons
in sentence
2993 examples of Weapons in a sentence
We now know that just 100 relatively “small” Hiroshima-size nuclear weapons, less than one-thousandth of the global nuclear arsenal, could lift millions of tons of dark smoke high into the atmosphere.
Intent, miscalculation, technical failure, cyber attack, or accident could cause the nuclear escalation of a conflict between India and Pakistan, in the Middle East (embroiling Israel’s nuclear weapons), or on the Korean peninsula.
We will not prevent further proliferation of nuclear
weapons
and their eventual use, much less achieve a world free of nuclear weapons, without strict international control of all uranium enrichment, and without banning the separation of plutonium from spent fuel.
Today, that means preventing the threat of climate change and eradicating nuclear
weapons.
After their qualification for this year’s World Cup, the Ivory Coast’s national team, including players from the north and south, addressed all of their fellow citizens, asking the warring factions to lay down their
weapons
and to put an end to the conflict that has shattered their country.
“Leveling the battlefield” by providing
weapons
to moderates is, at best, a prescription for prolonged violence, with even more civilian casualties and refugees.
As a result, international cooperation to counter illegal fishing, smuggling of
weapons
and drugs, human trafficking, piracy, and the use of vessels in terrorist operations has been greatly hampered.
The turn for the worse followed last year’s chain of events, which started with the United Nations’ accusation that the Assad regime had used chemical
weapons
and ended with the US-Russia brokered agreement to destroy the regime’s chemical arsenal (thereby avoiding a poorly planned and ill-timed Western military intervention).
In a joint press conference with his Syrian counterpart, Walid al-Moallem, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov tabled a proposal, originally agreed with Iran, calling for Syria to “place chemical
weapons
storage sites under international control.”
First, there is evidence that the Syrian opposition has amassed chemical
weapons.
In December 2012, Iran officially informed the US about chemical weapons, including sarin gas, being transferred to Syria.
Both Iran and the US consider the use of
weapons
of mass destruction a grave crime.
Iran maintains that the Security Council is the only body legally authorized to verify allegations concerning the use of such deadly
weapons
and to decide on the appropriate response.
Obama has his “red line” on the use of chemical
weapons.
Now watch this video on the challenges facing France’s President-elect Emmanuel Macron:Central Asia’s Waking GiantTHE HAGUE – The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) brings together almost half the world’s population, several members own nuclear weapons, many are big energy suppliers, and it includes some of the world’s fastest growing economies.
It has forsworn nuclear weapons, having signed a comprehensive nuclear-safeguards agreement with Argentina and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
With our neighbors on both shores of the South Atlantic, Brazil is working closely to strengthen the Zone of Peace and Cooperation of the South Atlantic (ZPCSA), which aims to keep the ocean free from rivalries foreign to it and from nuclear
weapons.
It possesses a large arsenal of nuclear weapons, a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, enormous reserves of oil and other minerals, a recent record of robust economic growth, and more territory than any other country despite being only three-fourths the size of the former Soviet Union.
Its voice should be heard on matters ranging from terrorism and
weapons
proliferation to global climate change and energy policy.
While an outright military conflict between Israel and the US on one side and Iran on the other side remains unlikely, it is clear that negotiations and sanctions will not induce Iran’s leaders to abandon efforts to develop nuclear
weapons.
Moreover, Israel has practically abandoned any hope of receiving agreed gas supplies from Egypt, and has not pressed its demand that Egypt block the passage of sophisticated
weapons
to Gaza.
And nuclear power plant designs can be made safer with passive (automatic) safety systems and fuel cycles that leave behind less radioactive waste and fissile material that could be turned into
weapons.
A system based on sharia (Islamic law) has been imposed, human-rights abuses are legion, and cross-border movement of
weapons
and militants has undermined the security of Libya’s neighbors.
Whether the US government deliberately lied to the world about the existence of Iraqi
weapons
of mass destruction or got carried away by its own rhetoric is less important than the lesson to be learned: it is dangerous to put excessive power in the hands of a few.
If the housing market started to fail, these paper assurances of safety would become, in Warren Buffett’s words, “financial
weapons
of mass destruction.”
Intelligence reports had not established that there were
weapons
of mass destruction in the country, yet British Prime Minister Tony Blair dutifully followed US President George W. Bush in ordering his military to invade.
And yet all of the Republican candidates are proud of opposing gun-control measures; indeed, they have no problem allowing people to enter a school or a bar bearing concealed
weapons.
For the Bank of Japan (BoJ), which committed an unprecedented arsenal of unconventional policy
weapons
to arrest a 19-year stretch of 16.5% deflation lasting from 1994 to 2013, this is more than just a rude awakening.
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, in a meeting with US National Security Adviser Susan Rice and others, explained that Israel could not antagonize Russia for fear that it would provide Syria with sophisticated
weapons
systems (primarily S-300 anti-aircraft missiles) – a move that would upend the status quo in Israel’s strategic environment.
When he threatened retaliation for Israel’s defense relationship with Georgia under former President Mikheil Saakashvili, a Kremlin foe, Israel acquiesced, abandoning the provision of
weapons
systems and relevant training.
Back
Next
Related words
Nuclear
Their
Would
Which
Destruction
Chemical
Could
World
Military
There
Other
Against
About
International
Countries
States
Program
Should
Country
After