Violence
in sentence
5085 examples of Violence in a sentence
'R Xmas is one of the only films I've seen where I can almost say that simply nothing happens.I felt as though I watched a drug dealing middle- class couple,with child,walk around,eat,smoke,converse(excuse me,swear)through most of the film.And I don't believe I'm missing the point.I think this film was well directed,well acted(although the husband's performance was rather wooden),and the constant feeling of impending doom around every corner certainly kept the viewer involved.But when the dust clears,your left with zero(just a boat-load of fade outs).I didn't want car chases,gun violence,beatings,etc.In fact,I'm sick of violence.But my goodness,let's at least get a bit deeper into all these characters(let's get to know each of these corrupt officers a little better-not just show glancing shots of them as street thugs).Why was the dialogue so juvenile?
There's plenty of nudity and
violence
on hand, but not much sense alas (especially since its subplot involving a secret society of vampires infiltrating the power structures is barely developed); the film is also overlong for its purpose, and eventually slips into tedium during the last half-hour.
The
violence
was relentless and insane.
The violence, as with most of the developments in the story, is titillating and whatever morality is supposedly served up, it's of the lite variety.
Prehistoric society, adventure, romance, true brotherhood, violence, sex, religion; all depicted abundantly..without a single word uttered!!!
As for the violence, don't worry: most of it is too badly done to offend anyone.
His baseball career was unparalleled in absurd statistics, brilliant strategy, and pure unadulterated
violence.
Not because of the story line, not because of the graphic violence, and the nudity.
No gore, no sex, no nudity, no real
violence.
It goes out of its way for
violence
and action, occasionally completely violating the spirit of the book.
The dialogue is four-letter-word disgusting throughout, and the flick offers no let-up from its barrage of
violence
and stupidity.
I do not know what today's movie goers expect, but after 68 years of movie watching.. (Well maybe I didn't watch many movies in the first 9 - 10 years, so make that 58 years of movie watching) I expect to be entertained, not bored to tears, assaulted by continuous profanity (every other word) and idiotic scenes of
violence
that are presented in with no other purpose in mind but to show blood splattering and body parts being mangled.
As a combat veteran I have seen violence, blood and gore, in many forms, and movies like We were soldiers is about as violent as a movie can get, but it has redeeming value.
The only reason anyone might have to see this movie would be to see whether the gratuitous
violence
lived up to all the hype (which quite frankly is why they added it).
When we re-watched, sitting down for family time,we were all mortified at the
violence
and life-threatening situations the poor otter got into.
Wilderness" is loaded with ugly hardcore sex,forced incest and blatant racism.It's as politically incorrect as XXX roughies get.The score is stolen from seminal Hitchcock's horror classic "Psycho" and also "Jaws".The acting is hilariously awful,the editing is bad and there are some huge lapses in logic.The repetitive nature of the sex scenes grinds the movie after while so the brief running time is a blessing.The scenes of
violence
are quite nasty for example the hippie girl is stabbed with the machete in her groin and one can see blood on her crotch.3
I'm not opposed to
violence
in movies but this whole thing seemed to be nothing more than an excuse to blow away one person after another, many of whom were only marginally connected with the storyline.
He could use a better script, however, since the manner in which he exposes the truth about corruption and
violence
inside the prison is never very convincing.
I don't mind a little violence, the first one was incredibly violent but this one is just plain nasty.
The director simply pours on the mindless
violence
(people even get burned alive and blown up), turning this into an urban version of "Commando" (and Charlie, like Arnold, rarely bothers to protect himself from the enemy gunfire).
The reason I give this film two stars instead of zero because it's a movie that has
violence
and gore and critters, yet it is planned out poorly.
There is a great emphasis on excessive violence, including torture.
But the writers of this movie chose to only include the
violence
and forget about the good things God did for the Israelites.
We all know that bad things happen; the interesting bit is to learn why but this film just gratuitously depicts a
violence
without ever unravelling the thinking that has led to it.
And if you're looking, at least, for stylized, shoot-'em-up-type
violence
you'll get none here.
This is a perfect example of the 90's mainstream horror crap.Nothing is scary here and the film is almost bloodless.Yes,there is some violence,but everything is politically correct like in a TV movie.This is not a completely bad picture,I can safely say that I found it quite enjoyable.However a lack of the originality really hurts "Voodoo".All in all if you are a part of the mainstream audience and pseudo-horror movies like "Scream" are your favourite then you'll love "Voodoo",but if you want something very gruesome avoid this film.
To not have any real
violence
but have enough nudity in an attempt to cover up the fact there is no real plot?
Fraternity boys descend on the punkers to do some
violence
on them and turn them into victims.
It was one of those pictures that received an X rating for
violence.
If you are interested only in mindless action and
violence
then the movie is easy enough to watch.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Against
There
Their
People
About
Women
Would
Movie
Other
Political
Sexual
World
Could
Country
While
Domestic
After
Should
Without