Tribunal
in sentence
169 examples of Tribunal in a sentence
Judges have sentenced too many killers to absurdly lenient prison terms, diminishing any deterrent effect that the
tribunal
might generate.
Instead of turning them over to the tribunal, Racan used the opportunity for a power play, requesting a parliamentary vote of confidence for what was intended to be a soft-pedaling of the Hague
Tribunal'
s warrants.
The outpouring of emotion evident at Shahbag was provoked by a decision of an international criminal
tribunal
convened by the government.
The tribunal, which tries cases of war crimes and crimes against humanity, found a prominent member of Bangladesh’s largest Islamist political party, Jamaat-e-Islami, guilty of complicity in the killings of 300 people, but gave him a relatively light sentence of 15 years in prison (prosecutors had sought the death penalty).
But the government remains resolute in its support for the international
tribunal.
The Conventions require that, where there is any doubt, a hearing must be held before an impartial
tribunal
to determine whether a prisoner seized during an armed conflict is entitled to prisoner-of-war status.
Finally, an independent criminal
tribunal
must be set up to investigate the June Fourth massacre, and those found responsible for the killings and other atrocities, including former Premier Li Peng, must be indicted and brought to trial without impunity.
The International Criminal Court - a
tribunal
with potential worldwide jurisdiction over genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity - is built on a comparable catalytic theory.
An international
tribunal
may be the only hope.
Similarly, the war crimes
tribunal
for former Yugoslavia, based in The Hague, insists on the surrender of former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic and other indicted suspects.
But the half-hearted prosecution that it has been willing to contemplate so far highlights the need for an international
tribunal.
Nor are the talks a Syrian ploy to avoid facing an international
tribunal
on the assassination of Lebanon’s former prime minister, Rafik Hariri.
Cambodia’s political leaders and donor states should do more to underscore the value of wide-ranging debate about the
tribunal
and the larger legacy of Cambodia’s civil conflict.
In cases of extreme rights abuses, the chance that an international criminal
tribunal
will ultimately sit in judgment of those principally responsible is growing, thereby becoming a deterrent to would-be tyrants elsewhere.
But perhaps the greatest significance of these cases lies in their very presence on the docket of Europe’s highest rights
tribunal.
Indeed, given rising tension with Israel and possible indictments of its operatives by the international
tribunal
investigating the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafic al-Hariri, Hezbollah appears to be hemmed in on all sides.
In describing the
tribunal
as part of an Israeli plot, Nasrallah warned the government and other parties in Lebanon against cooperating with it, or accepting its verdicts.
The
tribunal
also found that acts of genocide (killing Muslims and “causing serious bodily or mental harm”) were committed when Bosnian Serbs attacked seven predominantly Muslim municipalities in 1992.
The
tribunal
convicted him of the “spread of terror,” a massive war crime, and of murdering civilians in Sarajevo, essentially labeling him a terrorist, not unlike those who are destroying the lives of Muslims, Yazidis, and Christians in Iraq and Syria today.
Other bodies want to revive the idea of creating an international
tribunal
to investigate war crimes in Chechnya.
It is Russia’s role as a veto-wielding permanent member of the United Nations Security Council that has made it impossible to establish a
tribunal
to hold accountable those on all sides who commit war crimes and crimes against humanity, or to refer the matter to the International Criminal Court.
Worse than that, a number of Republican senators, including such luminaries as John McCain, called for stripping Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who is a US citizen, of his legal rights and placing him before a military
tribunal
as an “enemy combatant,” as though the 19-year-old college student were a soldier in a war against America.
Five years after the world’s first permanent criminal
tribunal
commenced operations, it has made its mark.
Africa is poised to establish its own human rights tribunal, fifty years after Europe, 25 years after the Americas, and two years after the International Criminal Court.
After all, it is difficult to commit the kind of mass atrocities that would be tried by an international
tribunal
without the involvement of heads of state and other top officials.
The Palestinians, however, always wanted to return to the issues of 1948: refugees, dispersion, and what Akram Hanya, a close Arafat confidant, defined as the need “to make the Israelis face the
tribunal
of history.”
The Trials of ManThis week, the United Nations began discussions on creating a permanent "War Crimes
" tribunal.
Here, Vaclav Havel discusses the fundamental ideals on which such a
tribunal
may be based, the UN’s "Universal Declaration of Human Rights."
Indeed, the special "War Crimes
" tribunal
for Bosnia at work in the Hague derives its powers from the declaration.
The capture of Karadzic and his arrival at the war crimes
tribunal
in The Hague took me back to a long night of confrontation, drama, and negotiations – the only time I ever met him.
Back
Next
Related words
International
Crimes
Against
Would
Former
Which
Other
Criminal
Military
Before
After
There
Their
Could
Establish
Court
Special
Committed
Cases
Under